Перейти к содержимому

4 Compact .380 Pistols Compared — Which One Would a Gunsmith Actually Recommend?

Hoàng Lê

0:00 / 0:00

4 Compact .380 Pistols Compared — Which One Would a Gunsmith Actually Recommend?

673 просмотра · 4 дн. назад
Hoàng Lê
172 подписчика
673 просмотра · 4 дн. назад
Four compact .380 pistols went through 200 rounds each on the same day with the same shooter. One choked twice and locked up at round 147. 📖 The book I mention in the video — The Gunsmith's Buyer's Manual: ivan.myreads.store Two others had minor hiccups. One cycled everything without a single failure. Eighteen months of shop records tell a different story. The Bodyguard 2.0 came back 11 times for repairs or trade-ins. Extractor failures, trigger return springs breaking, customers asking what they should have bought instead. The LCP MAX showed up 4 times, mostly for upgrades and one broken firing pin at 1,200 rounds. The Glock 42 came in twice for normal wear around 2,000 rounds. The P365-380 came in zero times for functional problems. The pattern comes down to internal design choices. The Bodyguard's heavy double-action trigger and flexing plastic guide rod compound feeding issues. The LCP MAX starts showing recoil spring fatigue and extractor tension loss around 1,500 rounds. The Glock 42 routinely runs 4,000 rounds before needing a spring. The P365-380 shares the over-engineered dual-spring system from the 9mm P365, which means it outlasts the frame.Chronograph data shows the longer barrels on the P365 and Glock deliver 50 to 70 fps more velocity with the same defensive load. Timed drills show the P365's grip texture and geometry keep it flatter under recoil and faster back on target. The Sig costs $100 to $150 more than the LCP MAX and weighs 17.8 oz loaded versus 14.2 oz, but the reliability record and trigger quality justify the tradeoffs for most carriers.