#6: Why the Crime Scene Supports the Menendez Brothers' Story | Revisiting Menendez

Jordan and Maya discuss why the coroner's testimony from the first trial supports the Menendez brothers' story of an unplanned, panicked killing, and how the prosecution's recreation from the second trial is an inaccurate characterization of the crime scene. Trigger Warning: homicide, discussion of specific wounds, image containing blood 0:00 Introduction 0:24 Background on shotguns 4:49 Background on the brothers' story 8:50 First Trial - Coroner's testimony 9:23 Most wounds were distance shots 12:36 High number of shots 14:24 Mixed ammunition 15:35 Shots broke the windows 17:24 Jose's leg wound 22:09 All wounds inflicted before death 24:58 Jose's contact head wound 28:50 Kitty's contact head wound 35:13 Coroner's credibility issues 39:18 Second trial - Failure Analysis - Crime scene recreation 42:42 Recreation assumed brothers shot from behind first 45:06 Concluded Jose's leg wound was inflicted after death 47:33 Defense discredits recreation - Dep. Van Horn 48:41 Ron Linhart 52:08 Martin Fackler 52:48 Our thoughts on Failure Analysis 56:52 Final thoughts Sources: Court Testimony: https://www.courttv.com/trials/ca-v-m... (Videos 17, 18, 51, 59) American Justice - The Menendez Murders:    • Видео   A Failure of Analysis? Article: https://books.google.com/books?id=izz...