When My AI Auditor and I Disagree, I Win | The Warp Sessions 2

The Warp Sessions · Track 2 of 3 Agents are sycophants. They tell you what you want to hear. So in this one I grade four email drafts from my colleague email skill blind, against a fixed rubric, before Codex sees my answers. Then Codex audits the same drafts blind. I taught for years, and you do not score on mood. You score on standards. Some drafts pass my bar and some do not. Then Codex and I disagree about the Marcus email. I read it again, and Codex is wrong: saying you will hold a decision open is not committing to it in writing. I accept two of Codex's findings, overrule two, and repair only what I accepted. Then I explain how the skill keeps getting better every time I use it. The Warp Sessions Track 1: My Coding Agent Was Grading Its Own Homework    • My Coding Agent Was Grading Its Own Homework   Track 2: When My AI Auditor and I Disagree, I Win    • When My AI Auditor and I Disagree, I Win |...   Track 3: Press Enter, Walk Away    • Press Enter, Walk Away: A Five-Pane Claude...   My consulting and coaching site: https://sheahan.ai My writing and demos: https://maxsheahan.com Chapters 0:00 Codex is wrong 0:16 Blind audits, and when we disagree, I win 0:51 Three and a half panes 1:40 The rubric: you do not score on mood 2:05 The four drafts land 2:20 Dana: the 90% rule 3:35 Priya: facts, not blame 4:58 Marcus: nothing on the record 6:04 Sam: too many thank-yous 6:32 My verdict locks, and Codex's audit comes in 7:01 The dispute over Marcus 7:52 The ruling: accept two, overrule two 9:26 How the skill improves every time I use it 11:07 Next: full automation