Перейти к содержимому

We Went Back to the Moon After More Than 50 Years... So Why Didn't We Land?

Sleep On Science

0:00 / 0:00

We Went Back to the Moon After More Than 50 Years... So Why Didn't We Land?

4 365 просмотров · 5 ч назад
Sleep On Science
89,8 тыс. подписчиков
4 365 просмотров · 5 ч назад
On April 1, 2026, four astronauts launched aboard the most powerful rocket ever flown with a crew, flew all the way around the Moon, broke the record for the farthest any human has ever traveled from Earth, and came home without ever trying to land. Artemis II was not a failure. It was the plan. But why would you go all that way and not touch the surface? This deep dive tells the full engineering story behind humanity’s return to the Moon. We trace the 54-year gap from Apollo 17 to Artemis II, explain why the Orion capsule is physically incapable of landing, explore the two radically different lunar landers being built by SpaceX and Blue Origin, reveal why NASA redesigned Artemis III from a Moon landing into an Earth-orbit test flight, and look ahead to Artemis IV, the mission designed to finally carry astronauts to the lunar south pole for the first time in human history. Sources: NASA, “Artemis II,” NASA, 2026. https://www3.nasa.gov/specials/artemi... NASA, “Ignition: NASA’s Plan for The Moon,” NASA, 2026. https://www.nasa.gov/gallery/ignition... Shreya Chandra, “Artemis Rewritten: NASA’s New Moon Plan, Its Risks, and Whether the U.S. Can Still Beat China,” Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2026. https://aerospace.csis.org/artemis-re... Asa Stahl, “What We Know About Artemis III: NASA Announces Crew,” The Planetary Society, 2026. https://www.planetary.org/articles/wh... #Artemis #NASA #Moon #SpaceExploration #ArtemisII #LunarLanding #SpaceX