Continuity in an AI Microdrama at Volume (4 Rules)

Continuity in an AI microdrama is the first thing that breaks when you're shipping sixteen episodes on a schedule, and it never breaks loudly. I run the documents in once, all at once — treatment, screenplays, director's bible, character sheets — and invideo agent structures them into Context, the project's memory. Four production rules live on that page: camera locked for every dialogue shot, hair open and never a bun, standing for every line in the Mayfair scene, and no morphing. I read them off the page because a rule survives a season and a description survives one generation. For Episode 5, both location plates lock as spatial anchors — the Shoreditch flat and the Mayfair boutique — and three character sheets save to Context the same way. The shot direction gets read close to word for word, invideo agent routed the generation to Kling 3.0, and the attachment panel shows exactly what rode along: the sheets, the plates, the rules. One catch I kept in: a take came back with position drift and a duplicated character on the boutique shot. invideo agent caught it against the rule and regenerated it before it reached my review queue. Try invideo agent: https://invideo.io/ 0:00 Continuity in an AI microdrama breaks first 0:24 The 4 production rules 0:48 Why locked sheets do not carry continuity 1:14 The documents that go into Context 1:46 The 4 rules read off the page 2:16 Why a rule beats a fix 2:44 References for both Episode 5 locations 3:11 The character sheets 3:42 The hair rule and the standing rule 4:09 The second plan 4:33 The shot direction, read aloud 5:00 Settings and their reasons 5:31 Routed to Kling 3.0 5:51 Enforced, not spot-checked 6:19 Ask before generation 6:42 The catch in production 6:59 Both ends of the guard 7:19 What continuity buys on a schedule 7:47 The trade I accept 8:11 The proof 8:40 The verdict #invideoagent #AIMicrodrama #Continuity