Concourt Clause By Clause: What's Really in the bill?

Summary of the episode with Dr Batlhalefi Letshwiti Tutwane The episode discusses the constitutional Court clause by clause to give voters what is contained in the Bill The discussion was prompted by the article written by Dr Tutwane which appeared in Patriot on Sunday 26 January 2026 where you discussed the Constitutional Court clause by as way to contribute in a small way to educating ourselves and each other as voters on Constitutional Court during the referendum The episode covers the following areas 1. Self introduction: growing up?work life?what did you study? Media law? Constitutionalism in Seoul? We want to establish your competence to talk about this matters 2. What motivated you to write the newspaper article? 3. At one public debate you said your main worry/concern is not money. Explain? 4. You wrote: ‘Much of the debate so far has been whether to have this court or not. There is no discussion whatsoever about the content of the Bill. It is like there is no Bill.’ Explain 5. Constitutions have permanence and therefore constitutional making must be pursued with sober minds and seriousness. Why do you say there is no seriousness? 6. Why do nations make constitutions? You note three purposes? What are they? 7. Discourse dominated by the President and Ministers but they omit talking about the Bill. This is a national tragedy. Explain 8. Clause 11 creates Concourt as first instance and last instance 9. Clause 7a narrows the High court from ‘unlimited original jurisdiction’ to ‘original jurisdiction’ 10. Clause 12 Composition of the Judicial Service Commission which includes Deputy Chief Justice and retired Judge Change of wording from ‘acting in accordance with the advice of Judicial Service Commission’ to ‘ acting with the advice of the Judicial Service Commission’ What the is the meaning of the change