Перейти к содержимому

SC RULING ON UNPROGRAMMED APPROPRIATION ft. Atty. Camille Sue Mae L. Ting

KaMAtis Analysis Unit (KAU)

0:00 / 0:00

SC RULING ON UNPROGRAMMED APPROPRIATION ft. Atty. Camille Sue Mae L. Ting

4 599 просмотров · Трансляция закончилась 1 день назад
KaMAtis Analysis Unit (KAU)
64,9 тыс. подписчиков
4 599 просмотров · Трансляция закончилась 1 день назад
SC spokesperson sa unprogrammed appropriations ruling: "The accountability was not an issue in this case." Ano ang ibig sabihin ng Lagman v. Congress para sa 2024, 2025 at 2026 budget? Reaction sa SC press briefing. Reaction to the Supreme Court press briefing of SC spokesperson Atty. Camille Sue Mae L. Ting on the Lagman v. Congress ruling on unprogrammed appropriations. According to the Court's statement, unprogrammed appropriations are not unconstitutional per se as long as they comply with specific conditions, but Congress violated the Constitution when it increased the total appropriations submitted by the President. Under the doctrine of operative fact, irreversible good-faith programs under the 2024 and 2025 GAAs remain valid, while a 2026 special provision was struck down. Ting said the case did not determine individual liability, any case must be filed before the proper tribunal, and the decision is not yet final and executory. Sources: Daily Tribune: https://tribune.net.ph/2026/10/21/sc-... Manila Times: https://www.manilatimes.net/2026/10/2... Manila Times: https://www.manilatimes.net/2026/10/2... GMA News explainer: https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/topst... Atin Ito: https://www.atinitonews.com/2026/10/c... Daily Tribune (ruling): https://tribune.net.ph/2026/10/20/hig... Chapters: 00:00 Intro 04:01 "Aray mo, Supreme Court" 04:28 SC spokesperson Atty. Camille Sue Mae L. Ting 05:14 Lagman v. Congress: ano ang pasya 06:32 Congress cannot increase the President's budget 08:21 Doctrine of operative fact 10:25 Accountability: "not an issue in this case" 11:47 Grave abuse of discretion vs bad faith 13:45 Bakit issues lang na nilatag ang dinedesisyunan 16:42 Kasama ba ang implementors? 18:37 "It will depend on the case" 20:32 Not yet final and executory: MR in 15 days 21:35 Paano magkakaroon ng kaso 22:11 Legality, hindi liability 23:58 Hindi unconstitutional per se 24:29 Ano ang epekto sa 2026 projects 26:15 Bakit masakit ang 2026 stop 28:21 Remedies sa tamang tribunal 31:26 Good-faith programs, valid pa rin 32:05 Hindi buong GAA ang void, at wrap-up Photo credits (thumbnail, via Wikimedia Commons, public domain): Marvic M.V.F. Leonen, Supreme Court of the Philippines; background, Batasang Pambansa session hall, House of Representatives of the Philippines. Mag-subscribe at i-on ang notifications para sa susunod na live reaction. #UnprogrammedAppropriations #SupremeCourt #LagmanVCongress