SC RULING ON UNPROGRAMMED APPROPRIATION ft. Atty. Camille Sue Mae L. Ting
KaMAtis Analysis Unit (KAU)
0:00 / 0:00
SC RULING ON UNPROGRAMMED APPROPRIATION ft. Atty. Camille Sue Mae L. Ting
4 599 просмотров · Трансляция закончилась 1 день назад
KaMAtis Analysis Unit (KAU)
64,9 тыс. подписчиков
4 599 просмотров · Трансляция закончилась 1 день назад
SC spokesperson sa unprogrammed appropriations ruling: "The accountability was not an issue in this case."
Ano ang ibig sabihin ng Lagman v. Congress para sa 2024, 2025 at 2026 budget? Reaction sa SC press briefing.
Reaction to the Supreme Court press briefing of SC spokesperson Atty. Camille Sue Mae L. Ting on the Lagman v. Congress ruling on unprogrammed appropriations. According to the Court's statement, unprogrammed appropriations are not unconstitutional per se as long as they comply with specific conditions, but Congress violated the Constitution when it increased the total appropriations submitted by the President. Under the doctrine of operative fact, irreversible good-faith programs under the 2024 and 2025 GAAs remain valid, while a 2026 special provision was struck down. Ting said the case did not determine individual liability, any case must be filed before the proper tribunal, and the decision is not yet final and executory.
Sources:
Daily Tribune: https://tribune.net.ph/2026/10/21/sc-...
Manila Times: https://www.manilatimes.net/2026/10/2...
Manila Times: https://www.manilatimes.net/2026/10/2...
GMA News explainer: https://www.gmanetwork.com/news/topst...
Atin Ito: https://www.atinitonews.com/2026/10/c...
Daily Tribune (ruling): https://tribune.net.ph/2026/10/20/hig...
Chapters:
00:00 Intro
04:01 "Aray mo, Supreme Court"
04:28 SC spokesperson Atty. Camille Sue Mae L. Ting
05:14 Lagman v. Congress: ano ang pasya
06:32 Congress cannot increase the President's budget
08:21 Doctrine of operative fact
10:25 Accountability: "not an issue in this case"
11:47 Grave abuse of discretion vs bad faith
13:45 Bakit issues lang na nilatag ang dinedesisyunan
16:42 Kasama ba ang implementors?
18:37 "It will depend on the case"
20:32 Not yet final and executory: MR in 15 days
21:35 Paano magkakaroon ng kaso
22:11 Legality, hindi liability
23:58 Hindi unconstitutional per se
24:29 Ano ang epekto sa 2026 projects
26:15 Bakit masakit ang 2026 stop
28:21 Remedies sa tamang tribunal
31:26 Good-faith programs, valid pa rin
32:05 Hindi buong GAA ang void, at wrap-up
Photo credits (thumbnail, via Wikimedia Commons, public domain): Marvic M.V.F. Leonen, Supreme Court of the Philippines; background, Batasang Pambansa session hall, House of Representatives of the Philippines.
Mag-subscribe at i-on ang notifications para sa susunod na live reaction.
#UnprogrammedAppropriations #SupremeCourt #LagmanVCongress