Перейти к содержимому

Why You Perform Worse When Someone Is Watching You?

Subconscious Curiosities

0:00 / 0:00

Why You Perform Worse When Someone Is Watching You?

938 просмотров · 10 дн. назад
Subconscious Curiosities
1 подписчик
938 просмотров · 10 дн. назад
You have typed your PIN thousands of times. Then someone steps into line behind you, and suddenly your finger hovers over the keypad like it's meeting numbers for the first time. Four digits. You chose them yourself. And yet, the moment someone is watching, your hands seem to forget everything they know. In this video, we discuss: The Audience Paradox: Why being watched makes some people better and others worse, and how a theory from 1965 tried to explain both at once. The Cockroach Stadium: What a surprisingly serious experiment with watching cockroaches revealed about simple tasks versus complicated ones. The Supervisor on Your Shoulder: Why consciously controlling a well-practiced skill can make you worse at it, from typing a PIN to putting in golf. The Crowded Workspace: How worry may take up space in working memory, leaving less room for the thing you're actually trying to do. The Audience in Your Head: What the spotlight effect and the illusion of transparency suggest about how much people are really noticing. If your hands have ever stopped working the second someone looked at them, your brain isn't broken. It's just performing for an audience that mostly isn't paying attention. Note: research on social facilitation has produced mixed results over the decades, and explanations like drive theory, evaluation apprehension and attention-based accounts of choking are evidence-supported theories, not settled facts. Some findings mentioned in this video come from single studies. This video is for education and entertainment, not psychological advice. If performance anxiety is affecting your daily life, a mental health professional can help. Sources & further reading: The early question Triplett, N. (1898). The dynamogenic factors in pacemaking and competition. American Journal of Psychology, 9(4), 507–533. Strube, M. J. (2005). What did Triplett really find? A contemporary analysis of the first experiment in social psychology. American Journal of Psychology, 118(2), 271–286. Drive theory & the cockroach study Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149(3681), 269–274. Zajonc, R. B., Heingartner, A., & Herman, E. M. (1969). Social enhancement and impairment of performance in the cockroach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13(2), 83–92. The pool players Michaels, J. W., Blommel, J. M., Brocato, R. M., Linkous, R. A., & Rowe, J. S. (1982). Social facilitation and inhibition in a natural setting. Replications in Social Psychology, 2, 21–24. Mixed results & the role of evaluation Bond, C. F., & Titus, L. J. (1983). Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 94(2), 265–292. Cottrell, N. B., Wack, D. L., Sekerak, G. J., & Rittle, R. H. (1968). Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audience and the mere presence of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(3), 245–250. Choking under pressure Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 701–725. Beilock, S. L., Carr, T. H., MacMahon, C., & Starkes, J. L. (2002). When paying attention becomes counterproductive: Impact of divided versus skill-focused attention on novice and experienced performance of sensorimotor skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8(1), 6–16. Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2005). When high-powered people fail: Working memory and "choking under pressure" in math. Psychological Science, 16(2), 101–105. The audience in your head Gilovich, T., Medvec, V. H., & Savitsky, K. (2000). The spotlight effect in social judgment: An egocentric bias in estimates of the salience of one's own actions and appearance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 211–222. Gilovich, T., Savitsky, K., & Medvec, V. H. (1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others' ability to read one's emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 332–346. Savitsky, K., & Gilovich, T. (2003). The illusion of transparency and the alleviation of speech anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(6), 618–625. The centipede "The Centipede's Dilemma," a 19th-century poem commonly attributed to Katherine Craster. #psychology #socialfacilitation #chokingunderpressure #spotlighteffect #humanbehavior