Перейти к содержимому

3 Year Practice Case LIVE: What Supreme Court Said Today? Impact on Judiciary Aspirants

The Law Tales

0:00 / 0:00

3 Year Practice Case LIVE: What Supreme Court Said Today? Impact on Judiciary Aspirants

13 373 просмотра · Трансляция закончилась 1 месяц назад
The Law Tales
21,2 тыс. подписчиков
13 373 просмотра · Трансляция закончилась 1 месяц назад
🔴 LIVE: 3 Year Practice Rule — Supreme Court Hearing Today The Supreme Court is hearing the constitutional challenge to the 3-year practice requirement for judicial services. This judgment will directly impact thousands of judiciary aspirants across India. ⚖️ Key Issues Being Argued Today: • Does it disproportionately affect fresh law graduates? • Can state bar council enrollment substitute continuous practice? • What did previous judgments say? 📌 Why This Matters For YOU: This hearing will decide whether fresh law graduates can sit for judiciary exams directly or must complete 3 years of practice first. A decision either way changes your preparation timeline. 🗣️ Join the Live Discussion: Drop your questions in the chat — "Will this apply to all states?" | "Can we still prepare while practicing?" | "Timeline for final judgment?" 📢 Share this live with every judiciary aspirant who needs to know. #SupremeCourt #3YearPracticeRule #JudiciaryAspirants #Article233 #LawStudent #JudiciaryExam2026 #LiveLaw #SupremeCourtLive #TheLawTales #Advocate #LawGraduate #JudicialServices