Muhoozi and the New York Times’ Uganda Warning.
Mordecai Muriisa Live
0:00 / 0:00
Muhoozi and the New York Times’ Uganda Warning.
11 685 просмотров · 17 часов назад
Mordecai Muriisa Live
71,5 тыс. подписчиков
11 685 просмотров · 17 часов назад
Ladies and gentlemen, Uganda is being warned, and this time the warning is coming from The New York Times!
An article by Megan Stack, a contributing opinion writer, is raising serious questions about the authoritarian future taking shape in Uganda under the influence of Muhoozi Kainerugaba and an increasingly intrusive security apparatus.
The article, titled “The Authoritarian Future Is Already Here,” paints a deeply troubling picture of a country where citizens increasingly fear that there is nowhere to hide. Stack describes what she calls a growing web of state surveillance, enabled in part by foreign technology.
Her warning is chilling: technology has created an intrusive eye that never blinks, giving authoritarian governments new ways to monitor citizens and suppress dissent.
Think about that for a moment. Your phone, your online activity and your digital footprint could become tools of surveillance rather than instruments of freedom.
Stack also revisits details surrounding the treatment of writer Kakwenza Rukirabashaija after his detention, including evidence of degrading treatment and sexual humiliation by Muhoozi Muhoozi.
And here is what should worry every Ugandan: when surveillance expands and people fear the consequences of speaking, the damage goes beyond individual victims. It reaches journalists, activists, opposition supporters and ordinary citizens who simply want to express their opinions without fear.
A country does not lose its freedoms in one dramatic moment. Sometimes the space to speak shrinks gradually, criticism becomes risky, and citizens only realise how much has changed when fear has become part of everyday life.
Ugandans should not wait until everyone is afraid to ask questions before asking what is happening to their country.
This is bigger than one politician, one journalist or one newspaper article. It is about privacy, accountability, freedom of expression and the kind of future Ugandans want to live in.
Because once surveillance becomes normal and fear becomes routine, reclaiming lost freedoms can become much harder.
The warning is there. The question is whether Uganda will pay attention.