CJI-SC DON'T INTERFERE ! MODI GOVT WARNS CJI...DON'T ISSUE NOTICE TO SPEAKER #cjisuryakant #notice
Law Chakra
0:00 / 0:00
CJI-SC DON'T INTERFERE ! MODI GOVT WARNS CJI...DON'T ISSUE NOTICE TO SPEAKER #cjisuryakant #notice
13 205 просмотров · 9 часов назад
Law Chakra
852 тыс. подписчиков
13 205 просмотров · 9 часов назад
*The Supreme Court was asked NOT to issue notice to the Lok Sabha Speaker.*
And the Court didn’t.
But on the very same day, in the same case, it issued notice to *20 MPs* accused of defecting from the TMC.
That distinction is at the heart of today’s hearing.
The petition, filed by *Abhishek Banerjee**, challenges the delay in deciding disqualification petitions against the 20 MPs. The question before the Court is not simply whether notices have been issued — it is **when the proceedings will actually be concluded.*
Justice Joymalya Bagchi put it sharply:
*“It is a question of concluding the proceedings within a time frame.”*
The numbers make the case even more significant.
TMC had *29 Lok Sabha MPs from West Bengal**. Twenty are now sitting with another party and supporting the NDA, leaving TMC with just **9 MPs* from the state.
The legal defence? *Merger.*
Under the Tenth Schedule, a merger can avoid disqualification if the constitutionally required *two-thirds* threshold is met. And 20 out of 29 is just above that threshold.
But TMC argues that the merger must involve the **political party itself**, not merely a group of legislators.
And there’s another crucial issue: *time.*
The Supreme Court has previously said that Speakers should ordinarily decide defection petitions within a reasonable timeframe, with three months being the general benchmark in *Keisham Meghachandra*.
So today’s real question may not be about *notice* at all.
It may be about the **clock**.
Because if a disqualification decision comes years later, after MPs have already completed most of their term, what practical difference does that decision make?
And that is why today’s hearing matters far beyond these 20 MPs.
*If the Speaker is the authority deciding a defection case — but the complaint itself is about delay by that authority — who ensures that the clock keeps moving?*
What do you think?
*Comment below.*
#SupremeCourt #CJI #TusharMehta #OmBirla #AbhishekBanerjee #TMC #Defection #AntiDefectionLaw #TenthSchedule #LokSabha #IndianPolitics #Parliament #SupremeCourtOfIndia #PoliticalNews #Constitution #LawCharcha
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For promotions and Collaborations reach us on- enquire@lawchakra.in
Follow us on Twitter:- / lawchakra
Follow us on Whatsapp : https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaP5...
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @lawchakra
Visit Our Website:- https://lawchakra.in/
Patna High Court Karnataka High Court Live Stream.
#Patnahighcourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Supremecourt
Courtesy :- Supreme Court of India
Books on Constitution:- https://amzn.to/3rqFpbh
Tools Used for editing:-
1. https://amzn.to/3EelR1r
2. https://amzn.to/3TWe6o7
For business Enquiries:- enquire@lawchakra.in
#SupremeCourt#Mussorrie #advocate #lawyer #legal #livehighcourt #indianlaw #law #live #court #argument #criminaljustice #guiltyminds #learnadvocacy #courtlive #justicelive #lawmotivation #beajudge #ias #judge #law #legal #patnahighcourt #justiceashutoshkumar #judiciary #motivation #learnlaw #IAS #supremecourtofindia #IPS #2022 #Patnahighcourtstream #orissahighcourt #SupremeCourt #Orissahighcourt#GujaratHighCourt
#Law #Chakra#JusticeAshutoshkumar
*This Video is strictly for Legal Awareness & Education Purpose only.📚
🙏 Follow us on twitter, Instagram and facebook.
@Lawchakra
👉Twitter
/ lawchakra
👉 Instagram.
/ lawchakra
📑*Fair Use Policy -*
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.