MJtv BIG BREAKING — Dogar Court’s detailed judgment demonises PTI’s yet to be held 27 Sep Long March
Matiullah Jan MJtv
0:00 / 0:00
MJtv BIG BREAKING — Dogar Court’s detailed judgment demonises PTI’s yet to be held 27 Sep Long March
58 349 просмотров · 1 дн. назад
Matiullah Jan MJtv
533 тыс. подписчиков
58 349 просмотров · 1 дн. назад
BIG BREAKING — Islamabad High Court’s detailed judgment on PTI’s September 27 Long March is out!
Chief Justice Sardar Sarfraz Dogar, heading the larger bench of the Islamabad High Court, has released a 37-page detailed judgment on the petition challenging PTI’s planned 27 September 2026 long march towards Islamabad.
What exactly has the Dogar Court ruled? Can a political party, provincial government or public office-holder block roads and disrupt the movement of citizens? What does the judgment say about the use of government machinery, provincial governments and public servants in the proposed march?
The court has ruled that no political party or government has a lawful right to occupy public roads, highways, interchanges, toll plazas or buildings in a way that obstructs citizens’ movement and access to business, medical and educational facilities. The judgment also addresses the constitutional implications of aggression by one federating unit against another or against the federation.
In this MJtv special analysis, Matiullah Jan, Saqib Bashir, Waseem Malik and Zulqarnain Iqbal examine the judgment page by page, its constitutional and political implications, the restrictions placed on provincial governments, and the possible impact on PTI’s September 27 mobilisation.
Is this simply a court decision — or effectively a charge sheet against PTI?
What does the judgment mean for the September 27 Long March?
And what are the legal consequences if the court’s directions are violated?
Watch the complete analysis and join the debate.