Can Parliament Escape Judicial Review? | I.R. Coelho Case Explained by Advocate Sreelekha Abburi

Can Parliament place a law in the Ninth Schedule and completely escape judicial review? In this video, Advocate Sreelekha Abburi explains the landmark I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu judgment and how the Supreme Court limited the protection available to laws under Article 31B and the Ninth Schedule. Discover why the Ninth Schedule was introduced through the First Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951, how it gradually became a constitutional shield, and why April 24, 1973, became a crucial cut-off date. This video explains: • Article 31B and the Ninth Schedule • The Basic Structure Doctrine • Judicial review of Ninth Schedule laws • The April 24, 1973 cut-off date • Waman Rao and Kesavananda Bharati judgments • The Rights Test or Effects Test • The importance of Articles 14, 19 and 21 • Tamil Nadu’s 69% reservation law • Constitutional supremacy and Parliament’s amending power The I.R. Coelho judgment made one principle absolutely clear: Parliament is powerful, but it is not above the Constitution. Watch the complete video to understand how the Supreme Court closed one of the most controversial loopholes in Indian constitutional law. Presented by Advocate Sreelekha Abburi. Subscribe for more videos on landmark judgments, Fundamental Rights and the Indian Constitution. I.R. Coelho case explained, I.R. Coelho v State of Tamil Nadu, Advocate Sreelekha Abburi, Ninth Schedule explained, Article 31B explained, judicial review in India, Basic Structure Doctrine, Kesavananda Bharati case, Waman Rao case, Ninth Schedule judicial review, Indian Constitution explained, landmark Supreme Court judgments, Fundamental Rights in India, Articles 14 19 and 21, Golden Triangle of Indian Constitution, Tamil Nadu 69 percent reservation, Parliament amending power, constitutional supremacy, First Constitutional Amendment 1951, Indian polity for UPSC, law students in India, constitutional law cases, Ninth Schedule case law, Supreme Court of India #IRCoelhoCase #SreelekhaAbburi #AdvocateSreelekhaAbburi #NinthSchedule #Article31B #JudicialReview #BasicStructureDoctrine #IndianConstitution #FundamentalRights #KesavanandaBharati #WamanRaoCase #SupremeCourtOfIndia #ConstitutionalLaw #IndianPolity #LandmarkJudgments #LawStudents #UPSCPolity #LegalEducation