Maintenance पर सुप्रीम कोर्ट के नए नियम | कब रुकेगा पत्नी का भरण-पोषण? Section 125 CrPC | 144 BNSS |

The Supreme Court of India, in Himanshu Chordia v. State of Rajasthan & Anr. (Judgment dated 31 July 2026), delivered an important judgment on maintenance under Section 125 CrPC (now reflected in the BNSS framework). In this exclusive interview, Advocate Vikas Gupta, who has over 35 years of experience in Criminal and Matrimonial Law, explains: • Whether a wife is entitled to interim or final maintenance if adultery is alleged. • When interim maintenance can be denied based on prima facie evidence. • Why the Supreme Court held that courts should decide objections under Section 125(4) before final disposal. • The importance of electronic evidence and Section 65B certification. • The Supreme Court's concern over the absence of regulation for private detectives in India. • Why the Court asked the Ministry of Law & Justice and the Law Commission to consider a legal framework for private investigators. Watch this detailed legal analysis to understand the implications of this landmark judgment for matrimonial disputes and maintenance cases. Guest: Advocate Vikas Gupta Channel: Legal Reporter #SupremeCourt #Maintenance #Section125 #Adultery #MatrimonialLaw #CrPC #BNSS #PrivateDetective #ElectronicEvidence #Section65B #FamilyLaw #LegalReporter #VikasGupta #SupremeCourtJudgment #IndianLaw #144BNSS