Information Quality and Good Governance: The Foundation of Public Trust

What makes information trustworthy before it reaches the public? In this episode, we explore an important governance distinction: verifying who submits information is not the same as verifying whether the information itself is accurate, complete, and reliable. Using a recent Thai SEC disclosure matter as a governance example, the episode examines why authentication, authorization, information quality, human review, and approval serve different control objectives — and why these distinctions become increasingly important as organizations use generative AI to support reports, disclosures, presentations, and public communications. Topics covered include: • Authentication vs. authorization vs. information quality • Why public disclosure changes the risk • Generative AI and information integrity • Human review and accountability • A four-stage disclosure workflow • Risk-based and proportionate controls • Why AI Governance must address both inputs and outputs Technology can accelerate communication. Governance is what preserves trust. This video is provided for educational and general informational purposes and does not constitute legal or regulatory advice. Flow AI Co., Ltd. — Thailand Building Trust in Emerging Technologies Governance · Compliance · Technology Law www.flowai.co.th I contact@flowai.co.th