颠覆认知!剧烈震荡!习近平大规模绑票老干部家属!Xi Jinping Allegedly Holds Senior Retired Officials’ Family Members Hostage!
Du Wen 内蒙古杜文
0:00 / 0:00
颠覆认知!剧烈震荡!习近平大规模绑票老干部家属!Xi Jinping Allegedly Holds Senior Retired Officials’ Family Members Hostage!
91 397 просмотров · 2 дня назад
Du Wen 内蒙古杜文
238 тыс. подписчиков
91 397 просмотров · 2 дня назад
成为此频道的会员即可获享以下福利:
/ @duwen2024
颠覆认知!剧烈震荡!习近平大规模绑票老干部家属!
Shocking Revelations! Political Earthquake! Xi Jinping Allegedly Holds Senior Retired Officials’ Family Members Hostage!
经过两个多星期的休假旅行,老杜复工,返回工作岗位,给朋友们献上一期重要的猛料节目。今天这期节目是本年度以来,也是本频道创办以来最重磅的一次爆料,没有之一,所以节目篇幅并不长,总时长约10分钟。
这次两周多的旅行,老杜一直与中国大陆的一些老同事旧朋友保持密切联系。由于少了很多工作方面的牵绊,联络的时间就多了,同时也由于老杜的人品和节目质量也越来越得到一些体制内知情者的认可,所以有越来越多的知情者愿意把最真实的消息透露给老杜。坦白讲,这段时间老杜听到了很多很多的事情,而这些事真完全是颠覆三观和既有认知的。可谓太残酷了。残酷到让人不可思议的地步。我们都知道习近平很黑很狠,但是真没想到他会黑狠到这种程度。以前感觉习近平的政权还算稳当,目前看完全是坐在火山口上,完全可以用风雨飘摇、刀光剑影、血雨腥风来形容。
第三个消息最炸裂,也是我们今天的节目主要话题。习近平在架离并软禁胡锦涛、肉体消灭李克强后,对于其他老政治局委员及常委们,则是直接寄出了反腐败大旗。大家可以设想一下,自江泽民时代以来,中共经济快速崛起,作为一个高度集权的国家,这些拥有最高权力的群体,即使他们不腐败,他们的亲属们获取巨额金钱的途径也可谓四通八达、信手拈来,即使有些看上去合理合法的收入,用今天的标准一套,也可以轻松扣上个贪渎腐败的帽子。这是这个集权体制本身的必然结果,无关个人道德和法律规范。为了消除一众中共前政治局委员及常委们可能的阻力,习近平责令中纪委围绕这些政治老人的过去及其党羽的腐败问题进行深入调查,重点是他们的秘书、幕僚、随从和妻子儿女们。秘书幕僚随从可以任意抛弃,但妻子儿女不行,于是老家伙们的妻子儿女就此完全沦为了肉票,习近平对于这些人的策略是:围而不歼,不逮捕他们,只软禁他们,持续调查他们,利刃高悬,但不落下,以老干部们的事迹举动决定是否砍下。也就是以持续高压反腐的政治正确,让这些老家伙们不敢发声,只能配合。中共政治就此沦为了彻头彻尾的人质政治。总书记大规模绑架离退休老同志亲属,以铁腕镇压巩固独裁,这在中共历史上,在中国各朝各代历史上都极其罕见,可谓旷古奇闻!这些东西不会写进中共的正式文件中,但它客观存在,因此中共目前的政治形势,可谓非常残酷和血腥,只是他们保密做的很好罢了。竟然被外界所忽视。
The third piece of information is by far the most explosive, and it is the main subject of today’s program.
According to the information provided to me, after having Hu Jintao escorted away and placed under de facto house arrest, and following Li Keqiang’s death—which I characterize as his physical elimination—Xi Jinping has turned the banner of “anti-corruption” directly against other retired members of the Politburo and former members of the Politburo Standing Committee.
Consider the situation. Since the Jiang Zemin era, China experienced extraordinarily rapid economic growth. In such a highly centralized political system, those occupying the highest positions of power—and especially their relatives—had countless avenues through which enormous wealth could be accumulated. Even if the senior officials themselves were not personally corrupt, their family members had extensive opportunities to make vast amounts of money. Income that might once have appeared reasonable or even lawful could, under today’s standards and political circumstances, easily be reclassified as corruption or abuse of power.
This is, in my view, an inevitable consequence of the authoritarian system itself, rather than simply a question of individual morality or legal compliance.
In order to neutralize potential resistance from former Politburo members and Standing Committee members, Xi Jinping has allegedly instructed the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection to conduct extensive investigations into the past conduct of these retired political heavyweights and into corruption involving people within their networks. Particular attention, I am told, is being paid to their secretaries, aides, associates, spouses, and children.
Secretaries, aides, and associates can be sacrificed. Wives and children cannot.
As a result, according to these sources, the spouses and children of these retired leaders have effectively become political hostages.
The strategy is allegedly this: surround them, but do not destroy them; do not formally arrest them, but restrict their freedom; keep investigating them indefinitely; keep the blade hanging over their heads, but do not let it fall. Whether that blade ultimately comes down depends on the behavior of the retired senior official concerned.
In other words, the political legitimacy of an ongoing, high-pressure anti-corruption campaign is allegedly being used to ensure that these retired political heavyweights remain silent and cooperative.
If these accounts are accurate, Chinese Communist Party politics has effectively descended into hostage politics.
For a General Secretary to allegedly use the relatives of large numbers of retired senior officials as leverage, employing coercive measures to consolidate personal rule, would be extraordinary even by the standards of CCP history—and extremely rare across the long history of Chinese politics.
None of this, of course, would ever be written into formal CCP documents. The information I am presenting here comes from insider accounts and has not been independently verified. But if those accounts accurately reflect what is happening behind the scenes, then China’s current political environment is far more brutal and volatile than the outside world realizes.
The reason it has largely escaped outside attention may simply be that the secrecy surrounding these operations has been extraordinarily effective.