IRB Police Raj Naik Exposed #viralbaba122 #cmogoa #goanews #dgpgoa #spcrimegoa

RTI Activist Alleges Identity Theft, Forgery; Seeks FIR and Probe Into Possible Police Link In a serious case raising questions of alleged impersonation, forgery and misuse of a citizen’s identity, RTI activist Atmaram D. Gadekar of Canca, Parra, Bardez, has approached the Goa Crime Branch seeking registration of an FIR against Raj Naik driver to SDPO vishwesh Karpe, he alleges, repeatedly used his name, address and forged signature to submit complaints, Right to Information applications and other correspondence to government and police authorities. In his detailed complaint dated August 17, and 20 aug Gadekar has alleged that communications were being sent in his name without his knowledge, consent or authorisation. He has categorically denied having signed or submitted the disputed communications or having authorised anyone to act on his behalf. The complaint assumes greater significance as Gadekar has expressed a strong suspicion that a police personnel could possibly be involved, citing what he describes as a recurring pattern in which communications made in his name were predominantly directed against police personnel and police establishments. He has, however, not named any individual and has specifically sought an investigation to establish the identity of those responsible. Gadekar has claimed that seven complaints were recently dispatched through Speed Post from the Mapusa Head Post Office—three on July 15 or 16 and another four on July 27, 2026. According to him, these complaints, purportedly made in his name, contained allegations against certain Crime Branch officials and others whom he says he does not even know. Copies were allegedly sent to senior authorities, including the Director of Vigilance, Chief Secretary, Chief Minister, State Police Complaints Authority, North Goa Superintendent of Police, Director General of Police and Deputy Inspector General of Police. Alleged forgery surfaced during Crime Branch inquiry According to Gadekar, the matter came to light after he was summoned before the Crime Branch in connection with one such communication. During the inquiry, he was shown a letter received by the authorities and the signature appearing on it. Gadekar claims he informed investigators that the signature was not his and appeared to be an imitation of his genuine signature. While it bore a resemblance to his signature, he claimed there were identifiable differences. He has consequently requested that the disputed documents and signatures be sent for scientific examination by a competent handwriting/document expert after obtaining specimens of his admitted signatures. The complaint further claims that similar instances were noticed earlier, including communications allegedly received by the Police Establishment Board and Home Department in 2025 in which his name and address were allegedly used along with purported signatures. UPI payment could provide crucial lead A potentially significant aspect highlighted in the complaint concerns the Speed Post consignment booked at Mapusa Head Post Office on July 27. Gadekar claims that during the Crime Branch inquiry it emerged that the postal charges for the article were paid through UPI. He has therefore urged investigators to obtain the complete transaction trail, including the transaction ID, date and time, UPI ID/VPA, remitter and account-holder details. He has argued that identifying the person who made the payment could provide a crucial lead to the person who actually booked or arranged the dispatch. However, Gadekar has urged police not to stop the investigation merely with the person who made the UPI payment or physically posted the article. He wants investigators to determine who allegedly conceived and prepared the complaints, supplied their contents, imitated his signature, arranged the payment and instructed the dispatch. If the person who physically dispatched the communication was acting at somebody else’s direction, Gadekar has demanded that investigators identify the alleged mastermind and all others who may have financed, facilitated, abetted or orchestrated the operation. Fear of identity being used as a ‘facade’ The activist has raised an even more serious apprehension that the repeated misuse of his identity could potentially be part of a larger mechanism in which complaints or RTI applications are made in another person’s name to exert pressure, harass individuals or secure an unlawful advantage. Gadekar has stressed that this is his apprehension and has asked investigators to objectively examine this angle. He has categorically denied any connection with such activity. Preserve Mapusa post office CCTV immediately #viralbaba122 #goanews #viralvideo #cmogoa #pmoindia #nitingadkari #ingoanews #goankarinews #viralshorts #goapolice #goadgp #spcrimegoa