UK Sergeant Tries To STOP DJ’s Drone… Then A Police Expert Exposes Him!

UNITED KINGDOM DJ Audits heads to Leicester to document a protest, but the situation quickly escalates when a UK sergeant challenges where he can film and whether he can legally fly his drone. The encounter raises questions around Section 14 of the Public Order Act 1986, filming in public, press status, drone interference, and the threatened seizure of equipment. DJ repeatedly asks for the legal basis behind the restrictions, but the sergeant maintains his position. Things take an unexpected turn when DJ speaks directly with the police drone operator, who provides a very different perspective and confirms that the proposed flight can be managed through proper coordination. Watch the full breakdown and decide for yourself: Was the sergeant applying the law correctly, or did his interpretation go too far? 👍 Like the video, 💬 share your opinion in the comments, and 🔔 subscribe to Audit Empire UK for more UK police audit analysis, accountability, and legal commentary. Disclaimer: This content is presented for educational, informational, commentary, and entertainment purposes. It discusses a publicly documented encounter and does not constitute legal advice. Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, fair use is made for purposes including criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. #ukpolice #DJAudits #policeaudit #ukaudit #Section14 #DroneRights #policeaccountability #uklaw #filminginpublic #AuditEmpireUK #policeexposed #UKSergeant