Is Knowledge Justified True Belief? A Lucky Guess Isn't Knowledge — Plato’s Theaetetus (Lecture 5)
Ergo
0:00 / 0:00
Is Knowledge Justified True Belief? A Lucky Guess Isn't Knowledge — Plato’s Theaetetus (Lecture 5)
386 просмотров · 3 мес. назад
Ergo
15,1 тыс. подписчиков
386 просмотров · 3 мес. назад
Lecture 5 of "Plato’s Theaetetus: An Inquiry into Knowledge."
In this fifth lecture, Richard Polt walks through the final stretch of Plato's Theaetetus, where Socrates and his interlocutors try every available strategy to pin down what knowledge really is. Starting from the problem of false judgment, the discussion moves through the aviary model of memory, the dream theory of perceivable but unknowable elements, and three versions of what it means to give an "account" of something: putting judgment into words, listing elements, and identifying a distinguishing mark. Each attempt collapses under scrutiny. The lecture highlights how spelling a name correctly could be a lucky guess, anticipating the modern Gettier problem that undermines justified true belief. Polt also connects these ancient puzzles to Descartes's self-evident truths, the unity of music and memory, and even questions about AI and learning. The dialogue ends without a definition of knowledge, but Socrates insists this apparent defeat is itself a philosophical victory.
Watch the full lecture series: • Plato’s Theaetetus: An Inquiry into Knowledge
About this course
Richard Polt leads a five-lecture exploration of Plato's Theaetetus, one of philosophy's most fascinating dialogues. The course takes up the fundamental question: what is knowledge? Theaetetus’s first proposal is that knowledge is simply perception. Polt traces how Socrates connects this idea to the relativism of Protagoras and the flux theory of Heraclitus, then dismantles it through arguments about expertise, self-refutation, and the role of the soul in grasping concepts. The inquiry shifts from perception to judgment, ending without a final answer. No prior background in philosophy is needed.
About Richard Polt
Richard Polt is a Professor of Philosophy at Xavier University. He holds a B.A. in philosophy from the University of California at Berkeley and a Ph.D. from the Committee on Social Thought at the University of Chicago. His interests include German and Greek philosophy, and he has taught courses on Heidegger, memory, history, technology, and African-American philosophy. Polt's publications include Heidegger: An Introduction, The Emergency of Being: On Heidegger's Contributions to Philosophy, and Time and Trauma: Thinking Through Heidegger in the Thirties. He has also edited or co-edited volumes including A Companion to Heidegger's Introduction to Metaphysics, Heidegger's Being and Time: Critical Essays, After Heidegger?, and The Task of Philosophy in the Anthropocene.
Chapters
00:00 Recap: True Judgment and the Wax Block Problem
01:03 The Aviary Model of Memory
02:56 Philosophy as Recollection
04:21 How False Judgment Works in the Aviary
06:18 The Circularity Trap in Explaining Error
09:15 The Jury Counter-Example
10:33 Justified True Belief and the Gettier Problem
13:10 Can Putting Judgment into Words Be Enough?
15:28 Listing Elements as an Account
18:16 The Dream Theory: Perceivable but Unknowable
22:18 The Parts and Wholes Dilemma
26:20 Self-Evidence and the Limits of Analysis
29:57 Descartes and Self-Evident Truths
31:39 Music, Memory, and Temporal Unity
33:56 Account as Distinguishing Mark
35:45 Wind Eggs and Socratic Wisdom
41:22 Snatching Victory from Defeat
44:16 Falsifiability, Learning, and AI
Presented by Ergo, a nonprofit that publishes in-depth philosophy courses taught by leading scholars. Every course is freely available. https://ergo.org
Connect with Ergo:
Subscribe: / @ergo_org
Instagram: / ergo_org
LinkedIn: / ergoorg