Paul Post-Death Condemned by Jesus in Revelation at least Four Times

0:00:00 Introduction: Did Jesus Condemn Paul in Revelation 2? 0:02:07 How to Test a Prophet and Determine Canon Using Deuteronomy 13 and 2 John 1:9 0:05:01 Paul's Claim in Ephesus and Sudden Defection 0:07:21 Jesus explicitly commends the church in Ephesus for testing claim to be apostle 0:10:02 Why a 13th Apostle is Mathematically Impossible 0:12:17 Pro-Paul Max Krenkel admitted that Revelation 2 Condemns Paul 0:16:46 Jesus warns of a "new Balaam" in Asia Minor (Turkey today). 0:20:40 Unmasking the Nicolaitans: The "Let Us Eat" Heresy 0:28:37 Eating Meat Sacrificed to Idols Banned by Jesus, Allowed by Paul 0:31:23 Paul's "Faith Alone" vs Jesus' Conditional Grace 0:38:12 - The "Depths of God" vs The "Depths of Satan" 0:42:24 - Conclusion: Choosing Between Christ and Paul Overall Summary In this video, we conduct a forensic audit of Revelation chapter 2 in particular to answer a critical question: Was the "apostle" Paul the false apostle whom Jesus condemned? Because Revelation was written around 67 AD after Paul's death recorded by Clement, Bishop of Rome, in 1 Clement 5:5, Jesus' words to the Apostle John serve as a final, divine judgment applicable to the early church. Jesus thus decided canon. It was up to humans to obey. . By comparing Paul's own epistles with the red letters of Christ, we examine how Paul claimed apostolic authority over the church of Ephesus, yet was ultimately abandoned by them . We explore how Jesus positively commended this exact church for exposing a false apostle . Furthermore, we dive into the rule of there are only 12 "Apostles of the Lamb" Jesus Christ in Revelation 21:14. , the real meaning behind the word "Nicolaitans" , and direct doctrinal collisions between Jesus and Paul regarding faith, works, and eating meat sacrificed to idols . Ultimately, believers are faced with a choice between the traditions of men and the unadulterated words of Christ