Перейти к содержимому

Psychology of Intelligence: Learn Anything So Fast It's Almost Unfair

Psynapse Lab

0:00 / 0:00

Psychology of Intelligence: Learn Anything So Fast It's Almost Unfair

171 просмотр · 6 дн. назад
Psynapse Lab
1 подписчик
171 просмотр · 6 дн. назад
Psychology of Intelligence: Learn Anything So Fast It's Almost Unfair This video breaks down the research on why some people seem to learn something once while you have to relearn the same material again and again. UCLA memory researcher Robert Bjork spent decades studying what he called "desirable difficulties," and his new theory of disuse with Elizabeth Bjork explains why the smooth feeling of fluency tracks how easily you can recall something today, not what you will still have next month. Jeffrey Karpicke and Henry Roediger's 2008 Science study found that students who kept retrieving recalled more than twice as much as students who kept restudying, even though both groups predicted the same score. Nate Kornell and Bjork showed that people learned more from mixed practice but still rated blocked practice as better. Doug Rohrer's classroom research on interleaving and Lindsey Richland's work showing that failed guesses boost later learning all point to the same conclusion: the study habits that feel productive are usually the ones quietly costing you the most. If you've ever reread your notes, nodded along because every line looked familiar, and then blanked on a simple question a week later, you already know the feeling this video is about. Which of the five laws have you been getting wrong the longest? Be honest in the comments. #Psychology #Learning #CognitivePsychology #RetrievalPractice #SpacedRepetition #StudyTips #MemoryScience Research referenced: Bjork, R.A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings Bjork, R.A. & Bjork, E.L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation Karpicke, J.D. & Roediger, H.L. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning Kornell, N. & Bjork, R.A. (2008). Learning concepts and categories: Is spacing the "enemy of induction"? Cepeda, N.J., Vul, E., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J.T. & Pashler, H. (2008). Spacing effects in learning: A temporal ridgeline of optimal retention Richland, L.E., Kornell, N. & Kao, L.S. (2009). The pretesting effect: Do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning? Rohrer, D., Dedrick, R.F. & Stershic, S. (2015). Interleaved practice improves mathematics learning Mazza, S. et al. (2016). Relearn faster and retain longer: Along with practice, sleep makes perfect Husmann, P.R. & O'Loughlin, V.D. (2019). Another nail in the coffin for learning styles? Disclaimer: This video is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute professional psychological or medical advice. If you're struggling with your mental health, please reach out to a licensed therapist or mental health professional.