Earl Spencer's Diana Book EXPOSED By One Wrong Date — And He Won't Admit It!

Earl Spencer has shot himself in the foot. His new Diana book, Swan Song, was sold as the definitive, fact-checked record — the last word from a man who calls himself a historian. But one date destroys the framing: he claims Piers Morgan's paper published the intrusive gym photos of Diana, yet Morgan didn't join the Mirror until 1995. The host, a trained historian, walks through the Swan Song passage about the funeral phone call and the timeline that undoes it. Audio clips show Spencer insisting, interview after interview, that he deals only in facts and record without bias — while memory quietly gets promoted to evidence. A minor error becomes a credibility crisis. Then the methodology: facts versus conclusions, circumstantial evidence involving Harry and Meghan, and the admission that historians recover only about 90% of the past. The Lipstadt vs Irving libel case proves even history must be proven, not asserted. Spencer's non-apology — calling his account accurate 30 years on — taints everything else he wrote about Diana and exposes a real libel risk. Thank you to everyone who watches and weighs in — does this destroy Earl Spencer's credibility? Tell us in the comments and hit the notification bell. Subscribe for royal family book fact-check and royal commentary analysis. #EarlSpencer #SwanSong #PrincessDiana #PiersMorgan #RoyalFamily