Muslims, Prove Me Wrong: Has the Quran Been Changed?

Was the Quran preserved letter-for-letter, or does manuscript evidence prove it underwent deliberate human alterations and missing chapters? In this debate analysis, Apologetics Unpacked examines live cross-examinations between GodLogic, Life, and Muslim callers on the preservation and textual criticism of the Quran. We examine two monumental historical realities rarely discussed in mainstream dialogue: 1. The Lost Surahs of Sahih Muslim 1050: Abu Musa al-Ash'ari's testimony regarding entire forgotten chapters of the Quran (including a surah as long as Surah at-Tawbah) and why appealing to "abrogation" fails chronologically after the death of Muhammad. 2. The Sana'a Palimpsest (DAM 01-27.1): Textual criticism of the lower script (scriptio inferior) vs. upper script (scriptio superior), demonstrating how pre-Uthmanic companion codices were physically scraped, erased, and rewritten to enforce imperial uniformity. 3. The Jurisprudence of As-Suyuti: Citations from Al-Itqan fi 'Ulum al-Qur'an confirming historical memory loss, suppressed verses, and caliphal manuscript burnings. 📖 PRIMARY SOURCES REFERENCED: • Sahih Muslim 1050 (Abu Musa al-Ash'ari) • Al-Itqan fi 'Ulum al-Qur'an by Jalal al-Din al-Suyuti • Sana'a Palimpsest DAM 01-27.1 (Yemen Discoveries) • "Textual Criticism and Qur'an Manuscripts" by Dr. Keith E. Small • Sahih al-Bukhari 4987 (Uthman's Burning of Codices) • Surah At-Tawbah (9:74) Variant Readings 🔔 Subscribe to Apologetics Unpacked for systematic manuscript analysis, live debate breakdowns, and context-first biblical defense. #Apologetics #QuranPreservation #GodLogic #TextualCriticism #SanaaManuscript #Hadith #ChristianApologetics #BibleVsQuran #ApologeticsUnpacked