Перейти к содержимому

Why Did the Army Rebuild the M14 Decades After Replacing It?

Standard Issue

0:00 / 0:00

Why Did the Army Rebuild the M14 Decades After Replacing It?

92 просмотра · 3 дня назад
Standard Issue
137 подписчиков
92 просмотра · 3 дня назад
In June 2008, at Rock Island Arsenal, a two-star general hit a dime at a hundred yards with a rifle in a new aluminum stock. The part that fires was the barreled action of an M14 - a rifle the Army adopted in 1957 and, in December 1963, told the Senate it would buy no more of. This is the story of why the Army rebuilt it, told from the documents: the Army's own cost report, a 1967 House report, two field manuals, a Navy engineer's briefings, an Army major's 2009 study and the Army's own articles. 00:00 A general, a dime and an old rifle 00:53 Act One: One rifle to replace four 04:05 Act Two: No further procurement 07:42 Act Three: The rifle that wouldn't leave 10:06 Act Four: The half-kilometer 13:37 Act Five: Rock Island 16:34 Go back to that dime Standard Issue explains why the military does what it does. One strange thing, and the documents behind it. Twice a week. Every fact in this video is sourced below. What the documents do NOT say, and we say so in the video: Why the M14 and not a new rifle from the start. Nothing we read answers that. Which rifles the barreled actions came from, or what the conversion cost. The 6,200 figure comes from one slide in a Navy engineer's 2012 briefing, not from an Army production record. Major Ehrhart's "about fifty percent" comes from the comments of returning sergeants and officers, not from a measured count. He recommended a newer rifle, not the modified M14. Nothing we read says the 2020 marksman rifle replaced the rebuilt M14. "Replacing" means as the standard infantry rifle. The M14 never fully left: sniper rifle, Navy line-throwing, the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. If you have a dated source, leave it in the comments. Research and editorial direction: Martin Olivero. Narration is AI-generated (ElevenLabs). Music is AI-generated (Suno). Scenes labelled RECREATION and the thumbnail are AI-generated illustrations, not archival photos. SOURCES M14 Rifle Cost Analysis Report, Technical Report 68-4, U.S. Army Materiel Command, October 1968: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD06... National Park Service, Springfield Armory NHS, "Post WWII Rifle Development": https://www.nps.gov/spar/learn/histor... Report of the Special Subcommittee on the M-16 Rifle Program, House Armed Services Committee, October 19, 1967: https://archive.org/details/M16Ichord... FM 23-8, U.S. Rifle 7.62-mm M14 (1959, changes to 1962): https://archive.org/details/FM23-8 FM 23-10, Sniper Training, August 1994: https://archive.org/details/fm-23-10-... Maj. Thomas P. Ehrhart, "Increasing Small Arms Lethality in Afghanistan: Taking Back the Infantry Half-Kilometer," Fort Leavenworth, 2009: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA512... NSWC Crane, "M14 to MK 14 - Evolution of a Battle Rifle," May 2007: https://ndia.dtic.mil/wp-content/uplo... NSWC Crane, "The M14 EBR - a Continuing Evolution," 2012: https://ndia.dtic.mil/wp-content/uplo... "AMC Deputy Chief of Staff on Target with M14 Enhanced Battle Rifle," army.mil, June 26, 2008: https://www.army.mil/article/10394/ "US Army Reserve Shooting Team trains 82nd Airborne," DVIDS, April 2012: https://www.dvidshub.net/news/86584/u... "Army to field Squad Designated Marksman Rifle in September," army.mil, June 5, 2018: https://www.army.mil/article/206463/ "Raiders field new Squad Designated Marksman Rifle," army.mil, June 10, 2020: https://www.army.mil/article/236364/ "The Changing of the Guard," army.mil: https://www.army.mil/article/194222/t... U.S. Navy photos of M14 line-throwing: https://www.dvidshub.net/image/98473 and https://dvidshub.net/image/3103549/re... Civilian Marksmanship Program, "Chairman & CEO Update - Fall 2026": https://thecmp.org/chairman-ceo-updat... FOOTAGE AND PHOTOS U.S. Army training film TF 9-2970, "U.S. Rifle, Caliber 7.62mm, M14 - Operation and Cycle of Functioning" (1960), National Archives 111-TF-2970: https://archive.org/details/gov.archi... "The Big Picture: To Keep and Bear Arms," U.S. Army, National Archives 111-TV-557 (Pentagon aerial). U.S. Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force and National Park Service photographs, public domain, via DVIDS, army.mil, the National Archives and Wikimedia Commons. Springfield Armory exterior (2019): Carol M. Highsmith, Library of Congress. Photos that are not from the moment being narrated carry their real year and place on screen. Stock footage: Pexels and Pixabay. #M14 #MilitaryHistory #USArmy #StandardIssue #WhyDoesTheMilitary