Перейти к содержимому

Forward Deployed Engineers: Who Owns the Code After They Leave?

Chaotic Commits

0:00 / 0:00

Forward Deployed Engineers: Who Owns the Code After They Leave?

53 просмотра · 3 месяца назад
Chaotic Commits
22 подписчика
53 просмотра · 3 месяца назад
I read the AWS forward deployed engineering announcement and had thoughts. Palantir's been doing this for over a decade. OpenAI and Anthropic have FDE teams. A billion dollars from AWS means this is now the default enterprise AI onboarding model. Here's the question nobody in the sales conversation asks: when a vendor's engineer ships code to your production system and then leaves, who owns that code on day one thousand? This episode is not "is forward deployed engineering good or bad." It's about the incentive structure. A forward deployed engineer is optimizing for platform adoption, renewal milestones, and a case study that looks good in the next pitch deck. Your team needs a system that's legible in year three by someone who wasn't in the room. Those are different goals. If you don't name that mismatch before the engagement starts, your team is the one writing the postmortem. I also make the case that there's a version of this that actually works, but it's not the version where the FDE is a faster way to build something nobody can maintain. If you've inherited a system from someone who was building for someone else's future, this one's for you. Chaotic Commits, Episode 12 feat: embed a stranger in your codebase #techpodcast #engineeringleadership #enterpriseai #softwareengineeringcareer #AWS #vendormanagement #techdebt #forwarddeployedengineering