Перейти к содержимому

Jio Has More Customers. But Airtel Earns More? Airtel vs Jio | Case Study

Angel One

0:00 / 0:00

Jio Has More Customers. But Airtel Earns More? Airtel vs Jio | Case Study

46 166 просмотров · 2 недели назад
Angel One
4,35 млн подписчиков
46 166 просмотров · 2 недели назад
Today, Jio has more mobile subscribers than Airtel. But Airtel’s average customer generates more revenue. Airtel’s ARPU is around ₹264, compared with roughly ₹216 for Jio. That becomes even more surprising when you look at where Airtel came from. In 2016, Reliance Jio entered Indian telecom with free voice calls and extremely cheap data. In just 170 days, Jio crossed 10 crore subscribers. The entire telecom industry was forced into a brutal price war. Airtel’s ARPU, which had been around ₹196 in Q1 FY17, eventually fell close to ₹100. Its quarterly net income fell dramatically. Several telecom companies either shut down or merged. But this was not the first time Reliance had attacked Airtel. Back in 2002–03, Reliance Infocomm entered telecom with a massive fibre network and aggressive pricing. Airtel’s stock fell from around ₹45 to ₹19, and even Sunil Mittal reportedly told his team that everyone expected them to lose. But Airtel survived. Instead of fighting Reliance for every single customer, Airtel allowed some low-value users to move away, conserved capital and concentrated on network quality. Then came Gopal Vittal. When Vittal first joined Airtel, the company had around 1,600 different pricing plans across India. In his first months, instead of launching more plans, he cut them down to just four national plans. Airtel started behaving like one national consumer brand. But growth also created new problems. The company spent billions on spectrum and, in 2010, acquired Zain Africa for $10.7 billion. Airtel suddenly became a major African telecom operator, but the acquisition also increased debt and introduced an entirely new set of challenges. Then Jio arrived. Jio changed Indian telecom completely. Voice calls became effectively free. Data prices collapsed. Jio added 10 crore customers in just 170 days, and several existing telecom operators eventually disappeared or merged. Airtel could have responded by chasing every subscriber. Instead, it made another counterintuitive decision. In 2018, Airtel let around 40 million low-value subscribers go. That reduced pressure on its network, allowed Airtel to improve service for customers who were willing to pay more and created room to move spectrum from 2G towards 4G. At the same time, Airtel leaned into areas where Jio could not immediately replicate its advantage. Enterprise customers. Premium users. Existing corporate relationships. Africa. And eventually Airtel Money. Airtel slowly stopped trying to win purely on subscriber numbers and began focusing more heavily on the economics of each customer. That shift helps explain why Airtel today can have fewer mobile subscribers than Jio but still generate a higher ARPU. This is not just the story of Airtel vs Jio. It is the story of how a company survives when a competitor with more money enters your market. How do you decide which customers are worth fighting for? When should you stop competing on price? What should a company own, what should it outsource, and what can even be shared with competitors? And how do you survive the same kind of attack twice?