Перейти к содержимому

One Association, Ten Committees, Twenty Different Ways to Run an Award

Reviewr

0:00 / 0:00

One Association, Ten Committees, Twenty Different Ways to Run an Award

9 просмотров · 6 дн. назад
Reviewr
74 подписчика
9 просмотров · 6 дн. назад
Every committee in your association built its award its own way. Members feel the difference. Judges feel it. And when someone asks why a winner was chosen, the answer is usually "that's what the committee decided." 👇 In this webinar, Reviewr shows association awards administrators how to run every award on one consistent, defensible process while each committee keeps what makes its award its own. It's framed through Review Integrity, five questions every review process should be able to answer: Intake Proportionality, Rubric Clarity, Reviewer Calibration, Decision Traceability, and Loop Closure. What you'll see: ✅ How awards drift into a different process per committee: different forms, different tools, different judging, fewer staff ✅ What that inconsistency costs your members, your volunteer judges, and the credibility of your flagship awards ✅ The five Review Integrity questions, and how to tell whether you can answer each with data or only from memory ✅ Move 1: One standard, with written, weighted criteria for every award and a scorecard each committee owns ✅ Move 2: One front door for members, with one login, branded experiences, and member verification up front ✅ Move 3: One simple routine for judges, with every submission and scorecard side by side in one tab ✅ Move 4: Catch harsh or lenient judges before they tip a result, and keep comments on record ✅ Move 5: Build one award well, then copy it forward and improve it every cycle Plus a full live demo inside Reviewr, including: 🎥 A branded awards microsite and account creation with saved progress 🎥 A short nominator form that invites the nominee to complete their own application 🎥 Validated question types and uploads in over 130 file types 🎥 Eligibility questions that route each applicant to the awards they qualify for 🎥 The judge portal: full submission on the left, scorecard on the right, with optional redaction of personal information 🎥 Scorecards with written descriptions for each point value, plus a judge comment box Plus Q&A on SSO login, customizable thank-you pages, saved progress and submission status, downloadable responses, and automated reminders for nominees who haven't started. Timestamps: 0:00 Welcome and about Reviewr 2:00 Today's topic and agenda 3:30 Are you running every award the same way? 4:30 How it happens: every committee builds its own process 6:30 What members, finalists, judges, and your board are asking 7:45 What 20 different processes cost members, judges, and staff 9:30 Review Integrity: five questions every review process should answer 14:30 Move 1: One standard, each award's own criteria 15:45 Move 2: One front door for members 18:30 Move 3: One simple routine for judges 20:15 Move 4: Catch harsh or lenient judges 22:30 Move 5: Build one award well, then reuse it 24:00 Recap: five moves to one standard 24:45 Live demo: branded microsite and account creation 25:45 Live demo: nominator-to-nominee flow and question types 27:30 Live demo: eligibility and award matching 28:15 Live demo: the judge portal and evaluation view 30:15 Q&A and wrap-up Ten committees can keep ten different awards. They don't need twenty different ways to run them. 🔗 Book a demo: https://calendly.com/reviewrsoftware/... #AssociationManagement #AwardsProgram #MemberEngagement #VolunteerJudges #AwardsManagement #Reviewr