What REALLY happened in S&box’s Game Jam 3?

In this video, I break down the biggest controversies surrounding S&box Game Jam 3, including allegations of vote botting, concerns over older projects being submitted, criticism of the voting system, and the debate around whether certain entries followed Facepunch’s Game Jam rules. Before getting into it, I want to make something clear: this video is not intended to encourage harassment toward anyone mentioned. Some of the topics covered involve allegations, speculation, or information that was still developing at the time. Where something wasn’t confirmed, I tried to make that clear throughout the video. I also look at the controversy surrounding creators such as ‪@gabe.follower‬ and the discussion around previously developed work appearing in the jam, along with how Facepunch responded to concerns over voting integrity and rule enforcement. Facepunch’s official contest terms state that entries must follow the specific contest rules. The goal here is to document what happened and give context to the discussion around Game Jam 3, not to present unproven claims as fact or send people after individual developers. This video also includes comments and interviews from people involved with or closely following S&box and Game Jam 3. People interviewed: Garry Newman / Facepunch https://facepunch.com/ Arc / Filaments Software https://www.filamentssoftware.com/ CSEliot https://blinq.me/MtYJ4vHfATKG Join my Discord:   / discord   Game Jam 3 featured a £50,000 prize pool and community voting, making questions around voting integrity, eligibility, and rule enforcement especially important to the community. This video is intended to document the controversy, show the different sides of the discussion, and give viewers the context to form their own opinion. #sbox #SboxGameJam #GameJam3 #Facepunch #GarryNewman #GameDev #IndieGames #Source2 #GamingNews #GameJam