Перейти к содержимому

10 Prehistoric Objects Made For A Purpose Nobody Remembers

Prehistoric Cole и Hush Tome

0:00 / 0:00

10 Prehistoric Objects Made For A Purpose Nobody Remembers

4 199 просмотров · 10 ч назад
Prehistoric Cole и Hush Tome
4 199 просмотров · 10 ч назад
Each of these ten prehistoric objects was made with care, and none was left with an explanation of what it was for. A Bronze Age dirk from Oxborough, in eastern England, is about seventy-one centimeters long, yet its edges were left blunt and it has no rivet holes for a handle. Cycladic clay "frying pans" carry nearly all their decoration on the face that would sit in a fire, and none is burned or blackened. And one of the oldest so-called commander's batons, carved from mammoth ivory, may have been a tool for twisting marsh plants into rope. CHAPTERS 10. Cycladic "frying pans", Syros, Greece 9. Eye idols, Tell Brak, Syria 8. The Oxborough dirk, Norfolk, England 7. Folkton and Burton Agnes chalk drums, Yorkshire, England 6. Engraved slate plaques, Alentejo, Portugal 5. Bannerstones, eastern North America 4. Hohle Fels ivory baton, Swabian Jura, Germany 3. The Shigir idol, Ural Mountains, Russia 2. Stone spheres of 'Ubeidiya, Israel 1. Dōtaku bronze bells, Yayoi Japan SOURCES Original script written for this channel, not copied from any other creator. Researched from peer-reviewed archaeology and from excavation, museum and heritage-agency records, with one primary source per entry: 10. Papathanassoglou and Georgouli (2009), Archaeometry — experimental tests of the Early Bronze Age Aegean "frying pans" as liquid mirrors, with a review of the uses proposed for them. 9. Joan Oates (2005), Proceedings of the British Academy — the Brak excavators' account of the Eye Temple phases, the idols set in the mortar of its second phase, and the few examples found in place. 8. Amkreutz and Fontijn, eds. (2024), Larger than Life, Sidestone Press — the Ommerschans hoard and the giant Plougrescant-Ommerschans dirks, which match closely although no two were cast in the same mold. 7. Teather, Chamberlain and Parker Pearson (2019), British Journal for the History of Mathematics — the Folkton and Lavant drums as possible measuring standards based on the long foot. The narration presents this as a proposal, with the authors' own caveats. 6. Lillios, Tang and Bowen (2025), European Journal of Archaeology — a re-test of the genealogical reading of the engraved plaques on 657 classic examples. 5. Kinsella (2013), Ethnoarchaeology — the bannerstone as a counterbalance that eases the strain of holding a loaded atlatl ready. 4. Conard and Rots (2024), Science Advances — the Hohle Fels ivory baton, its residues and use-wear, and experimental rope making with a replica. 3. Zhilin and colleagues (2018), Antiquity — the new radiocarbon dates, tree rings, tool marks and faces of the Shigir sculpture. A 2021 follow-up by Terberger, Zhilin and Savchenko in Quaternary International moved the date to around 10,000 BC. 2. Muller and colleagues (2023), Royal Society Open Science — three-dimensional analysis of 150 limestone spheroids from 'Ubeidiya and the case that their makers aimed for a sphere. The narration gives the hammerstone explanation as the main objection. 1. Agency for Cultural Affairs of Japan, Cultural Heritage Online — the National Treasure record of the thirty-nine bronze bells from the Kamo-Iwakura site, Shimane. The find of 713 is taken from the court chronicle Shoku Nihongi. DISCLAIMER Educational and informational. Archaeology changes as new evidence appears, many points here are still debated, and the narration flags hypotheses and disputed readings where they occur. This video judges no culture, nation, ethnic group or religion, takes no political side, does not promote pseudoarchaeology, and is not intended to incite or offend. Naming a researcher or institution is attribution only, not endorsement. Corrections with a published reference are welcome. #Archaeology #Prehistory #AncientArtifacts #BronzeAge #StoneAge