You Don't Need Diagrams in LR | Thinking LSAT, Ep. 473

Since the LSAT dropped Logic Games, anxious test takers have feared the rise of more “formal logic” questions in Logical Reasoning. So far, no significant changes to LR have been disclosed. No matter what happens, every LR question is perfectly solvable with some careful reading and common sense—no diagramming required. Need proof? This week, Ben and Nathan make quick work of a Must Be True question that’s chock full of conditional logic. But first, they help a burnt-out student build a sustainable study plan. They compare the benefits of national and regional law schools. And they offer words of hope to low-GPA splitters. Get your best score with LSAT Demon. Sign up here: https://www.lsatdemon.com Choose from over 30 hours of live LSAT classes every week with a Demon Live subscription: https://www.lsatdemon.com/plans Use our Law School Scholarship Estimator to see what LSAT score you need to go to law school for free: https://www.lsatdemon.com/scholarships Meet the Demon’s amazing LSAT teachers and tutors: https://www.lsatdemon.com/about Learn more about Ben, Nathan, and their years of experience teaching the LSAT: https://thinkinglsat.com/about #lsatdemon #lsat #lsattips #lsatprep #lawschooladmissions 0:00 - Introduction 5:04 - Application Fee Waivers 8:52 - Scoring 160 16:18 - Burnout 23:50 - Confusing Language 32:20 - Small Town, Big School? 41:15 - Academic Renewal 46:56 - Hope for Splitters 50:13 - Don’t Diagram 1:10:41 - Tips from a Departing Demon 1:11:27 - Word of the Week