Impairment Loss Example: Two-Step Test & Entries | US GAAP
Farhat Lectures. The # 1 CPA & Accounting Courses
0:00 / 0:00
Impairment Loss Example: Two-Step Test & Entries | US GAAP
39 491 просмотр · 4 г. назад
Farhat Lectures. The # 1 CPA & Accounting Courses
286 тыс. подписчиков
39 491 просмотр · 4 г. назад
Calculate an impairment loss on equipment using the US GAAP two-step test. This worked example shows the recoverability test, the $3.2 million loss entry, depreciation after the write-down, and what happens when fair value later recovers.
For intermediate accounting students and CPA FAR or CMA candidates studying long-lived assets. The equipment remains held and used in operations; this is an ASC 360 example, not an IAS 36 value-in-use calculation.
WHY IS THE LOSS $3.2 MILLION?
1. Test recoverability: compare the $8 million carrying amount with $7 million of expected UNDISCOUNTED net cash flows. The carrying amount is not recoverable.
2. Measure the loss: $8 million carrying amount − $4.8 million fair value = $3.2 million impairment loss.
The $1 million shortfall in step 1 identifies the recoverability problem; it is not the loss measurement.
JOURNAL ENTRIES AND DEPRECIATION
The lecture records: debit Loss on Impairment $3.2 million; credit Accumulated Depreciation $3.2 million.
New carrying amount: $4.8 million.
Assuming straight-line depreciation, zero residual value and four remaining years: $4.8 million ÷ 4 = $1.2 million per year.
Annual entry: debit Depreciation Expense $1.2 million; credit Accumulated Depreciation $1.2 million.
CAN THE LOSS BE REVERSED?
For this asset held and used under US GAAP, a subsequent increase in fair value does not reverse the impairment. The lecture contrasts assets held for sale, which follow a separate fair-value-less-cost-to-sell model. Any later recovery under that model is limited to cumulative write-downs previously recognized under the held-for-sale model; reclassification does not undo a prior held-and-used impairment.
STUDY CLARIFICATIONS
Apply the recoverability test at the appropriate asset or asset-group level using cash flows from use and eventual disposal. A discounted-cash-flow valuation must use appropriate fair-value assumptions; it is not automatically the same as IFRS value in use. The discussion about similar intangible-asset testing concerns finite-lived intangibles. Indefinite-lived intangibles and goodwill have different impairment models. The held-for-sale and IFRS comparisons here are brief, not full lessons.
CHAPTERS
00:00 Equipment impairment example and assumptions
01:11 Step 1: test recoverability
02:01 $8 million book value versus $7 million cash flows
02:57 Step 2: measure the loss using fair value
04:00 Record the $3.2 million impairment entry
04:33 Depreciation question and study resources
05:39 Calculate depreciation after impairment
06:59 What if fair value rises to $5.3 million?
07:20 No reversal for assets held and used
07:49 Held-for-sale recovery comparison
08:51 Check the asset type and accounting model
09:29 Practice and closing review
CONTINUE STUDYING
Depreciation, Impairment & Depletion:
• Depreciation, Impairment & Depletion | Int...
Intermediate Accounting Course:
• Intermediate Accounting Course (I & II) | ...
More accounting lectures and practice: https://farhatlectures.com
#ImpairmentLoss #USGAAP #CPAExam