Eichmann trial - Session No. 106

Session No. 106 The cross examination of The Accused by the Judge Halevi. The Accused speaks of his self-examination in the context of guilt or lack of guilt; -The interest of The Accused to be tried in Israel and to be given the chance to clarify his involvement in the Holocaust for the sake of his family The courage to tell the truth, the fact that Wisliceny had called The Accused a coward while Henri Gerard Winkelman had contrasted The Accused with László Endre who had the courage to stand by what he had done; Hans Frank is mentioned who had stated that he couldn't deny his guilt and that a thousand years would pass and this crime would not be erased from the name of National Socialist Germany -Judge Halevi raises doubt that The Accused was capable of putting the quest for truth above his own persona well-being; -Question if the Accused is prepared to admit the facts themselves, like the Sassen memoirs;