Never Mix Family and Money? (This $2.4 Million Court Case Explains Why)
Steve On The Law
0:00 / 0:00
Never Mix Family and Money? (This $2.4 Million Court Case Explains Why)
658 просмотров · 7 дней назад
Steve On The Law
1,6 тыс. подписчиков
658 просмотров · 7 дней назад
Would you lend a family member $2.4 million without a written loan agreement?
In Zhou v Li [2026] NSWSC 258, a family business arrangement escalated into a Supreme Court dispute involving a 7-Eleven business, company funds, a multimillion-dollar property loan and a real estate development.
We examine why the court ordered substantial repayments, why the claimed security over the Epping property was unenforceable, and the legal lessons Australians should understand before lending money to family.
⏱️ Chapters:
00:00 The $2.4 Million Family Dispute
01:29 The 7-Eleven Business: Who Owned the Money?
06:19 Can a Director Use Company Money Personally?
09:38 The $2.4 Million Handshake Loan
14:27 The Burwood Property Development Dispute
16:44 Witness Credibility: Why the Evidence Mattered
19:22 Who Won the Supreme Court Case?
20:33 5 Legal Lessons for Australians
✨ 𝗷𝗼𝗶𝗻 Steve On The Law✨
/ @steveonthelaw
#australianlaw #LegalCaseStudy #propertylaw #businesslaw #SteveOnTheLaw