Перейти к содержимому

The 4% Rule Is Broken — Here’s What Smart Retirees Do Instead

Scott Finance

0:00 / 0:00

The 4% Rule Is Broken — Here’s What Smart Retirees Do Instead

569 просмотров · 7 ч назад
Scott Finance
388 подписчиков
569 просмотров · 7 ч назад
Is the 4% rule broken? Not exactly — it was built for the unluckiest retiree in modern history, and for someone who never adjusts. This breaks down where the rule actually came from, the two cracks that matter far more than the number itself, and the five moves real retirees use instead: Guyton-Klinger guardrails, a cash buffer, a Social Security bridge, the retirement spending smile with a floor-and-ceiling budget, and a yearly check-up. Real numbers on every one. What’s inside: Where the rule came from: Bengen’s 1994 test of every 30-year stretch on a 50/50 portfolio, with the late-1960s retiree as the worst case — a survival number, not an average Why the research no longer agrees: Morningstar’s 2026 figure is 3.9% (up from 3.7% a year earlier) while Bengen’s own 2025 update says about 4.7% On $1 million, that disagreement is an $8,000-a-year gap — a vacation, a roof fund, or a grandkid’s tuition, every single year What inflation does to a fixed withdrawal: $40,000 becomes about $53,757 by year 10 and roughly $72,244 by year 20, just to buy the same life Crack one — sequence of returns risk, the retirement red zone, and why a bad first five years does more damage than a bad last fifteen Crack two — the rule assumes you’re a robot who takes the same inflation raise after a 30% drop Move 1: guardrails let many retirees start near 5% — $50,000 instead of $40,000, and a 10% trim still leaves $45,000 Move 2: one to two years of spending in cash, so a 2022 (when a 60/40 portfolio lost close to 16%) never forces a sale Move 3: delaying Social Security past full retirement age adds about 8% a year — $2,000 at 67 becomes about $2,480 at 70, nearly $6,000 a year more, inflation-adjusted, for life Move 4: Blanchett’s spending smile, real spending drifting down about 1% a year, and why Paul found only 70% of his budget was truly essential Move 5: the one-hour January review — your rate is just this year’s spending divided by this year’s balance Sources: Bengen (1994) and his 2025 update “A Richer Retirement”; Morningstar 2026 safe-withdrawal research; Guyton-Klinger guardrails; David Blanchett on the retirement spending smile; Social Security Administration delayed retirement credits. Education only, not personal financial advice. #4PercentRule #RetirementPlanning #SafeWithdrawalRate #RetirementIncome #SocialSecurity #SequenceRisk #FIRE #PersonalFinance #ScottFinance #FinancialFreedom