Did Modern Feminism Go Too Far? | Basic Logic Reaction

Original video:    • How Feminism Justified Killing Children   Channel:    / @basiclogiciq   Artextric reacts to “How Feminism Justified Killing Children” by Basic Logic. In today’s reaction, we’re diving into one of the most controversial videos I’ve covered yet. Basic Logic uses the Lindsay Clancy case as the starting point for a broader argument about feminism, abortion, bodily autonomy, motherhood, public sympathy, and how society reacts differently to extremely serious cases depending on the circumstances surrounding them. The video argues that ideas commonly used in modern abortion and bodily-autonomy debates can be pushed much further than many people realize, and then connects that argument to broader claims about feminism, biology, history, and maternal instinct. This is obviously a highly sensitive and controversial topic, so I’ll be reacting to the arguments themselves, questioning where the logic holds up, where it may go too far, and separating the facts of the case from the larger ideological conclusions being made. Topics Covered: ⚖️ The Lindsay Clancy case 🧠 Public sympathy and accountability 🚨 Serious crimes involving children ♀️ Feminism and modern social arguments 🤔 Bodily autonomy and abortion debates 👩‍👧 Motherhood and maternal instinct 📚 Historical and biological arguments 💬 Basic Logic’s broader conclusions Video Discussed: “How Feminism Justified Killing Children” by Basic Logic Stay tuned for more internet commentary, controversial debates, reactions, and discussions from Artextric Reacts! ►DISCORD   / discord   ► Artextric Twiiter:   / artextric   ► Artextric Twitch:   / artextric   ► Artextric Tiktok:   / artextric   ► Artextric INSTA:   / artextric