Judge Judy Say Lets The DOG Decide Who Gets Custody, Verdict Is INSTANT | Judy Justice
Albert React
0:00 / 0:00
Judge Judy Say Lets The DOG Decide Who Gets Custody, Verdict Is INSTANT | Judy Justice
13 299 просмотров · 1 мес. назад
Albert React
1,56 тыс. подписчиков
13 299 просмотров · 1 мес. назад
Judge Judy Say Lets The DOG Decide Who Gets Custody, Verdict Is INSTANT | Judy Justice
Rhonda Jennings and her mother Margareta Taylor are suing Akilah Al-Asadi — a self-described psychic medium — for custody of a chihuahua that hasn't seen her in over a year. After untangling a confusing, contradictory timeline of who had the dog and when, Judy Justice decides to let the dog make the final call herself.
Watch as the chihuahua is set free on the courtroom floor and instantly runs to one side — delivering a verdict faster than any argument could, followed by Judy Justice's unforgettable parting shot about psychic abilities.
⏱️ Timestamps
0:00 – Case introduction & background
1:15 – Timeline of who had the dog
4:00 – Contradictions in the defendant's story
6:30 – Door damage claim explained
8:00 – Final timeline clarified
9:45 – The dog is released to decide
10:30 – Verdict & closing psychic joke
📌 Subscribe for more real courtroom drama and judgment day verdicts.
#JudyJustice #JudgeJudy #PetCustody #SmallClaimsCourt #CourtTV
What do you think of the judge’s reaction in this clip? Let me know in the comments below! 👇
🛡️ SUPPORT THE CHANNEL
If you enjoy this deep dive into the justice system and want to see more legal breakdowns, here is how you can support our work:
✅ Subscribe: Join our community for daily courtroom reactions!
🔔 Notifications: Turn on the bell so you never miss a verdict.
👍 Like & Share: It helps the algorithm show these videos to more law enthusiasts!
⚠️ LEGAL DISCLAIMER & WARNING
Warning: This doctrine safeguards the use of copyrighted material for transformative purposes, such as commentary, criticism, review, and news reporting.
This video is a transformative work created for the purposes of education, criticism, and commentary. Under Title 17 U.S.C. § 512(f), any person who makes a false, bad faith, or misleading copyright claim or uses a copyright takedown to infringe on free speech, criticism, or commentary can be held liable for damages to the content creator.
Legal Precedents for Fair Use:
Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)
Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015)
Disclaimer: The content provided in this video is for entertainment and educational purposes only and does not constitute professional legal advice
The People’s Court Full Episode
Paternity Court Full Episode
Full Episode Full Episode
Divorce Court Full Episode
Judge Mathis Full Episode
Divorce Court Full Episode
Judge Joe Brown Full Episode
Justice for the People with Judge Milian
Protection Court Full Episode
Lauren Lake’s Paternity Court Full Episode
Judge Faith Full Episode
Judge Hatchett Full Episode
America’s Court with Judge Ross
Judge Jerry
We the People with Judge Lauren Lake