Перейти к содержимому

Judge Judy Say Lets The DOG Decide Who Gets Custody, Verdict Is INSTANT | Judy Justice

Albert React

0:00 / 0:00

Judge Judy Say Lets The DOG Decide Who Gets Custody, Verdict Is INSTANT | Judy Justice

13 299 просмотров · 1 мес. назад
Albert React
1,56 тыс. подписчиков
13 299 просмотров · 1 мес. назад
Judge Judy Say Lets The DOG Decide Who Gets Custody, Verdict Is INSTANT | Judy Justice Rhonda Jennings and her mother Margareta Taylor are suing Akilah Al-Asadi — a self-described psychic medium — for custody of a chihuahua that hasn't seen her in over a year. After untangling a confusing, contradictory timeline of who had the dog and when, Judy Justice decides to let the dog make the final call herself. Watch as the chihuahua is set free on the courtroom floor and instantly runs to one side — delivering a verdict faster than any argument could, followed by Judy Justice's unforgettable parting shot about psychic abilities. ⏱️ Timestamps 0:00 – Case introduction & background 1:15 – Timeline of who had the dog 4:00 – Contradictions in the defendant's story 6:30 – Door damage claim explained 8:00 – Final timeline clarified 9:45 – The dog is released to decide 10:30 – Verdict & closing psychic joke 📌 Subscribe for more real courtroom drama and judgment day verdicts. #JudyJustice #JudgeJudy #PetCustody #SmallClaimsCourt #CourtTV What do you think of the judge’s reaction in this clip? Let me know in the comments below! 👇 🛡️ SUPPORT THE CHANNEL If you enjoy this deep dive into the justice system and want to see more legal breakdowns, here is how you can support our work: ✅ Subscribe: Join our community for daily courtroom reactions! 🔔 Notifications: Turn on the bell so you never miss a verdict. 👍 Like & Share: It helps the algorithm show these videos to more law enthusiasts! ⚠️ LEGAL DISCLAIMER & WARNING Warning: This doctrine safeguards the use of copyrighted material for transformative purposes, such as commentary, criticism, review, and news reporting. This video is a transformative work created for the purposes of education, criticism, and commentary. Under Title 17 U.S.C. § 512(f), any person who makes a false, bad faith, or misleading copyright claim or uses a copyright takedown to infringe on free speech, criticism, or commentary can be held liable for damages to the content creator. Legal Precedents for Fair Use: Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017) Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015) Disclaimer: The content provided in this video is for entertainment and educational purposes only and does not constitute professional legal advice The People’s Court Full Episode Paternity Court Full Episode Full Episode Full Episode Divorce Court Full Episode Judge Mathis Full Episode Divorce Court Full Episode Judge Joe Brown Full Episode Justice for the People with Judge Milian Protection Court Full Episode Lauren Lake’s Paternity Court Full Episode Judge Faith Full Episode Judge Hatchett Full Episode America’s Court with Judge Ross Judge Jerry We the People with Judge Lauren Lake