Why Ignoring Someone Works (And Why It Ruins Everything)
Zero Gray
0:00 / 0:00
Why Ignoring Someone Works (And Why It Ruins Everything)
84 просмотра · 2 нед. назад
Zero Gray
42 подписчика
84 просмотра · 2 нед. назад
The person who leaves you on read can seem more desirable than the one who always answers, and psychologists have actually measured that pull. But the same experiments found a catch that "play hard to get" advice never mentions.
In this video we go through five real studies:
*Cookie jar (1975):* why a nearly empty jar makes the same cookie more desirable.
*Uncertainty (2011):* why not knowing how someone feels keeps them on your mind.
*Wanting vs liking (Hong Kong, 2014):* how playing hard to get can make someone want you more while liking you less.
*The experiment that failed five times (1973):* the one kind of person who actually wins.
The answer isn't scarcity. It's feeling chosen.
*Chapters*
0:00 Intro: the person who leaves you on read
1:10 01 · The Cookie Jar
2:45 02 · The Mind That Can't Let Go
4:04 03 · Wanting Is Not Liking
6:01 04 · The Experiment That Kept Failing
8:11 05 · What Actually Wins
9:39 The takeaway
*Sources*
Worchel, Lee & Adewole (1975), *Effects of supply and demand on ratings of object value*, JPSP 32(5).
Brehm (1966), *A Theory of Psychological Reactance*.
Whitchurch, Wilson & Gilbert (2011), *"He loves me, he loves me not…"*, Psychological Science 22(2).
Berridge & Robinson (1998; 2016) on "wanting" vs "liking".
Dai, Dong & Jia (2014), *When does playing hard to get increase romantic attraction?*, JEP: General 143(2).
Walster, Walster, Piliavin & Schmidt (1973), *"Playing hard to get": Understanding an elusive phenomenon*, JPSP 26(1).
Eastwick, Finkel, Mochon & Ariely (2007), *Selective versus unselective romantic desire*, Psychological Science 18(4).
Birnbaum, Reis et al. (2016), *Intimately connected*, JPSP 111(4), and Birnbaum et al. (2014), PSPB.
Jonason & Li (2013), *Playing hard-to-get*, European Journal of Personality 27(5).
Visuals are illustrative. Bars marked "illustrative" show the direction of a result, not exact values. The 42 of 71 count is the commonly reported figure for Walster's sixth study.
ZERO GRAY: Nothing is as simple as it seems.
Strange facts. Hidden truths. Mind-bending ideas.
#psychology #datingadvice #playinghardtoget #scarcity #zerogray
───────────────────────────
ABOUT ZERO GRAY:
No toxic positivity. No comforting lies. Zero Gray breaks down the hidden mechanics of human behavior, cognitive blindspots, and practical philosophy through visual mental models.
Subscribe for mental clarity: / @zero0gray
───────────────────────────
#ZeroGray #Psychology #HumanBeha