Перейти к содержимому

Why Ignoring Someone Works (And Why It Ruins Everything)

Zero Gray

0:00 / 0:00

Why Ignoring Someone Works (And Why It Ruins Everything)

84 просмотра · 2 нед. назад
Zero Gray
42 подписчика
84 просмотра · 2 нед. назад
The person who leaves you on read can seem more desirable than the one who always answers, and psychologists have actually measured that pull. But the same experiments found a catch that "play hard to get" advice never mentions. In this video we go through five real studies: *Cookie jar (1975):* why a nearly empty jar makes the same cookie more desirable. *Uncertainty (2011):* why not knowing how someone feels keeps them on your mind. *Wanting vs liking (Hong Kong, 2014):* how playing hard to get can make someone want you more while liking you less. *The experiment that failed five times (1973):* the one kind of person who actually wins. The answer isn't scarcity. It's feeling chosen. *Chapters* 0:00 Intro: the person who leaves you on read 1:10 01 · The Cookie Jar 2:45 02 · The Mind That Can't Let Go 4:04 03 · Wanting Is Not Liking 6:01 04 · The Experiment That Kept Failing 8:11 05 · What Actually Wins 9:39 The takeaway *Sources* Worchel, Lee & Adewole (1975), *Effects of supply and demand on ratings of object value*, JPSP 32(5). Brehm (1966), *A Theory of Psychological Reactance*. Whitchurch, Wilson & Gilbert (2011), *"He loves me, he loves me not…"*, Psychological Science 22(2). Berridge & Robinson (1998; 2016) on "wanting" vs "liking". Dai, Dong & Jia (2014), *When does playing hard to get increase romantic attraction?*, JEP: General 143(2). Walster, Walster, Piliavin & Schmidt (1973), *"Playing hard to get": Understanding an elusive phenomenon*, JPSP 26(1). Eastwick, Finkel, Mochon & Ariely (2007), *Selective versus unselective romantic desire*, Psychological Science 18(4). Birnbaum, Reis et al. (2016), *Intimately connected*, JPSP 111(4), and Birnbaum et al. (2014), PSPB. Jonason & Li (2013), *Playing hard-to-get*, European Journal of Personality 27(5). Visuals are illustrative. Bars marked "illustrative" show the direction of a result, not exact values. The 42 of 71 count is the commonly reported figure for Walster's sixth study. ZERO GRAY: Nothing is as simple as it seems. Strange facts. Hidden truths. Mind-bending ideas. #psychology #datingadvice #playinghardtoget #scarcity #zerogray ─────────────────────────── ABOUT ZERO GRAY: No toxic positivity. No comforting lies. Zero Gray breaks down the hidden mechanics of human behavior, cognitive blindspots, and practical philosophy through visual mental models. Subscribe for mental clarity:    / @zero0gray   ─────────────────────────── #ZeroGray #Psychology #HumanBeha