SC WON'T STOP CJP PROTEST...CJI DENY INTERFERENCE WITH HC ORDER.....POLICE VIOLATED SC ORDER ?

The Supreme Court refused to stop the protest. Delhi Police detained the protest organiser hours later. Who decides the limits of the right to protest? Today, Justice Joymalya Bagchi summed up the conflict in one striking observation: “Someone wants to protest, someone wants to sell moongfali, someone wants to maintain law and order. All these are related.” Hearing a plea by traders seeking to stop the “Lehra Do Tiranga” march at Connaught Place, the Supreme Court declined to intervene, leaving the matter to the Delhi High Court. CJI Surya Kant acknowledged the difficulties small shopkeepers could face during the festive season, while the Bench said any disproportionate loss could be addressed through compensation. But hours later, at around 4:54 PM, Delhi Police detained Cockroach Janta Party’s Abhijeet Dipke as he was leaving home for Connaught Place. Police had reportedly offered to allow just 11 people to gather at Central Park, even as the park remained closed and prohibitory restrictions were in force. AISA’s Neha Bora was also reportedly detained during a Tricolour march from Mandi House. The development raises serious questions about the relationship between judicial directions, police powers and the constitutional right to peaceful assembly. Meanwhile, Delhi’s Chief Electoral Officer reportedly said that 47 lakh voters removed from the draft electoral roll were undergoing re-verification, adding another dimension to the controversy surrounding the SIR process. The concerns on both sides matter: traders have a legitimate interest in protecting their livelihoods, while peaceful protesters have rights that must be considered within the law. If the Supreme Court declines to impose a pre-emptive ban, how should police restrictions be assessed? And who should be accountable when restrictions prevent a protest from taking place? Watch the full breakdown and share your views in the comments. #SupremeCourt #DelhiPolice #RightToProtest #AbhijeetDipke #JusticeJoymalyaBagchi #CJI #FreedomOfExpression #SIR #Constitution #LawChakra ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For promotions and Collaborations reach us on- enquire@lawchakra.in Follow us on Twitter:-   / lawchakra   Follow us on Whatsapp : https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaP5... Join this channel to get access to perks:    / @lawchakra   Visit Our Website:- https://lawchakra.in/ Patna High Court Karnataka High Court Live Stream. #Patnahighcourt #SupremeCourtofIndia #Supremecourt Courtesy :- Supreme Court of India Books on Constitution:- https://amzn.to/3rqFpbh Tools Used for editing:- 1. https://amzn.to/3EelR1r 2. https://amzn.to/3TWe6o7 For business Enquiries:- enquire@lawchakra.in #SupremeCourt#Mussorrie #advocate #lawyer #legal #livehighcourt #indianlaw #law #live #court #argument #criminaljustice #guiltyminds #learnadvocacy #courtlive #justicelive #lawmotivation #beajudge #ias #judge #law #legal #patnahighcourt #justiceashutoshkumar #judiciary #motivation #learnlaw #IAS #supremecourtofindia #IPS #2022 #Patnahighcourtstream #orissahighcourt #SupremeCourt #Orissahighcourt#GujaratHighCourt #Law #Chakra#JusticeAshutoshkumar *This Video is strictly for Legal Awareness & Education Purpose only.📚 🙏 Follow us on twitter, Instagram and facebook. @Lawchakra 👉Twitter   / lawchakra   👉 Instagram.   / lawchakra   📑*Fair Use Policy -* Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.