Перейти к содержимому

The Physics of Why We Can't Just Go to Pluto and Back

Orbit Chronicle

0:00 / 0:00

The Physics of Why We Can't Just Go to Pluto and Back

2 486 просмотров · 8 дн. назад
Orbit Chronicle
18 подписчиков
2 486 просмотров · 8 дн. назад
New Horizons flew past Pluto in July 2015 after a nine-and-a-half-year, one-way trip — and it never stopped. It couldn't. In this video, we dig into a question that almost never comes up: what would it actually take to go back, stop, orbit, and come home? The answer isn't "twice as long." It's a physics problem most people have never heard of, and it means even an uncrewed robotic round trip would take somewhere between 25 and 40+ years, depending on the mission design. We cover New Horizons' record-breaking 2006 launch, the Jupiter gravity assist that saved three years of flight time, what the spacecraft actually found at Pluto, why slowing down in space is often harder than speeding up, real NASA-affiliated Pluto orbiter mission concepts (and why their timelines vary so widely), the orbital-mechanics problem of getting home, why a crewed mission is still firmly in science-fiction territory (radiation, life support, and a nine-hour communication delay), and the next-generation propulsion — ion engines and nuclear thermal rockets — that could eventually change the math, including the recently canceled DRACO nuclear propulsion program. Sources and further reading in the pinned comment. If you found the scale of this problem as fascinating as we did, give the video a like, share it with someone who'd enjoy the math behind it, and subscribe for more deep dives into what it actually takes to reach for the edges of our solar system.