Перейти к содержимому

EP 250 OMPRAKASH PARIHAR ADVOCATE SUPREME COURT SOUTH ASIA'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM OVERVIEW

courtse@Omprakash parihar advocate supreme court

0:00 / 0:00

EP 250 OMPRAKASH PARIHAR ADVOCATE SUPREME COURT SOUTH ASIA'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM OVERVIEW

44 просмотра · 12 дней назад
courtse@Omprakash parihar advocate supreme court
81 подписчик
44 просмотра · 12 дней назад
EP 250 OMPRAKASH PARIHAR ADVOCATE SUPREME COURT SOUTH ASIA'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM OVERVIEW In this episode, Omprakash Parihar, Advocate, Supreme Court, presents a comparative analysis of criminal jurisprudence across India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, the Maldives and Afghanistan. The discussion examines the region’s shared colonial legal foundations and its evolving constitutional and criminal-law systems. Key subjects include India’s new criminal laws—BNS, BNSS and BSA—fair-trial protections, arrest and bail, custodial violence, pre-trial detention, evidentiary challenges, sentencing, the death penalty and access to justice for vulnerable communities. This programme is intended for legal education and general awareness. It does not constitute legal advice. Subscribe to the channel for informed discussions on constitutional law, criminal justice and important judicial developments. #SouthAsianLaw #CriminalJustice #CriminalLaw #LegalAnalysis #SupremeCourt #OmprakashParihar #Advocate #IndianLaw #BNS #BNSS #BSA #ConstitutionalLaw #HumanRights #LegalEducation #LawStudents DISCLAIMER This video is intended solely for educational and general informational purposes. The views and analysis presented are based on publicly available legal materials and should not be treated as legal advice or a substitute for professional consultation. Laws, judicial decisions and legal procedures may change and may differ between jurisdictions. Viewers should consult a qualified legal professional regarding their specific circumstances. No advocate-client relationship is created by watching, sharing or commenting on this video. The creator assumes no responsibility for any action taken or loss incurred in reliance upon the information presented. References to countries, institutions, cases or individuals are made only for academic and comparative legal discussion.