Перейти к содержимому

The Sent Son: What the Father’s Will Actually Means and Why It Changes Everything

Theological Voice

0:00 / 0:00

The Sent Son: What the Father’s Will Actually Means and Why It Changes Everything

271 просмотр · 7 дней назад
Theological Voice
408 подписчиков
271 просмотр · 7 дней назад
The Epistle to the Hebrews closes its long argument against retreat into the old covenant with a single passage that does what no other text The New Testament’s repeated presentation of Jesus submitting to the Father’s will and declaring that he came not to do his own will but the will of the one who sent him has generated centuries of interpretive confusion. Subordinationists read the submission language as evidence of the Son’s ontological inferiority. Harmonistic deflectors attribute it entirely to the Son’s human nature and bracket it off from any deeper theological significance. Both trajectories fail because both impose frameworks foreign to the texts themselves. This article argues that the adequate framework is the one the Hebrew scriptures supply — the Targumic memra tradition, the Angel of Yahweh binatarianism, the two powers theology of Second Temple Judaism, and the three-rebellion cosmic-governance architecture running from Genesis through Deuteronomy — and that when those texts are read within their proper framework, Jesus’s submission to the Father is neither evidence of lesser being nor rhetorical accommodation. It is the executive Yahweh, the returning Shekinah, the memra who walked with Israel through every moment of their history, now incarnate in flesh and executing the most costly commission the Father has ever assigned any agent in the history of the creation. The kenosis of Philippians 2 is the precise Pauline account of how that execution was accomplished — through the voluntary assumption of slave-form in the Roman legal sense, with its juridical destiny of the cursed death of the cross, and through lifelong covenant loyalty to Yahweh maintained in the full conditions of genuine human existence. And the Father’s will that Jesus came to fulfill is not merely the forgiveness of individual sins but the comprehensive reversal of the three primeval rebellions — Eden, the Watchers, and Babel — and the cosmic reclamation of the nations the Father disinherited and always intended to bring home. If you want more deep, biblical-theological content like this, subscribe to my Substack: *[https://dalemoreau.substack.com](https://dalemoreau.substack.com)*