Перейти к содержимому

Trouble For Gyanesh In SC: Notices Issued| Questioned on Form6| DoubleCheck Class #gyaneshkumar

DoubleCheck By Sanket Upadhyay

0:00 / 0:00

Trouble For Gyanesh In SC: Notices Issued| Questioned on Form6| DoubleCheck Class #gyaneshkumar

166 429 просмотров · 6 часов назад
DoubleCheck By Sanket Upadhyay
194 тыс. подписчиков
166 429 просмотров · 6 часов назад
Trouble For Gyanesh In SC: Notices Issues, Files Asked For| DoubleCheck Class #gyaneshkumar This video from DoubleCheck by Sanket Upadhyay provides a detailed breakdown of the legal proceedings at the Supreme Court of India on October 5, 2026, regarding a petition filed against the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC), Gyanesh Kumar. Key Takeaways from the Hearing: No Suspension of CEC: The Supreme Court did not suspend the Chief Election Commissioner. The petition seeking his removal was not granted at this initial stage (01:42 - 02:20). Notice Issued: The court issued notices to the Union of India, the Election Commission of India (ECI), and Gyanesh Kumar individually, requiring them to file responses (02:50 - 03:10, 28:42 - 28:57). Focus on Procedures (SIR): The core of the petitions relates to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) process of voter rolls, with allegations that the CEC made decisions unilaterally, bypassing other Election Commissioners (04:54 - 05:10, 05:59 - 06:40). Questioning 'Form 6': A major point of contention is the alleged unauthorized addition of a new field in Form 6 for new voters. The Chief Justice of India specifically questioned who authorized this change (17:04 - 18:47). Files Requested: The court emphasized that it cannot act solely on media reports (such as those from The Indian Express). It requested all relevant files and documentation to verify whether internal decision-making processes were followed and if there was a lack of unanimity among the commissioners (24:59 - 25:31, 29:54 - 30:13). What Happens Next? The Election Commission and other notified officials (Sukhbir Singh Sandhu, Vivek Joshi, Manish Garg, and Seema Khanna) must respond to the court's notice (28:59 - 29:27). The court will review the submitted files to determine if any official orders were legally flawed or made without proper authority (27:26 - 27:56). The CEC remains in his position while the legal process continues (31:58 - 32:05).