Перейти к содержимому

NASA Moved a Mirror by 1/16 of a Hair. Now Its New Space Telescope Is Sharper Than Planned

Brink

0:00 / 0:00

NASA Moved a Mirror by 1/16 of a Hair. Now Its New Space Telescope Is Sharper Than Planned

9 просмотров · 4 ч назад
Brink
3 подписчика
9 просмотров · 4 ч назад
NASA's Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope is still on its way to L2, and its team just nudged a mirror by about a sixteenth of a hair's width. The result: optical error nearly 30% below what was required. What does that number really mean, why does Roman's 2.4-meter mirror come from a spy agency, and how will it hunt dark energy and planets nobody can see? Chapters 0:00 A sixteenth of a hair 0:45 Tuning a telescope in flight 2:57 A mirror from the spy world 4:46 A hundred Hubbles at once 7:03 Weighing nothing 8:33 Planets you can't see 10:33 What we don't know yet A word on how this was made: the narrator is Brink's synthetic voice, produced by an AI speech model rather than a person at a microphone. AI tools helped draft the script; the channel's owner chose the angle, checked each claim against NASA's mission blog and fact sheets, and cut what could not be confirmed. Diagrams, graphics and music were made for this video. Which would you rather Roman answers first: what dark energy is, or how many planets like ours are out there? Filings, papers and statements NASA Roman blog, 'NASA Roman Team Checks Out Main Instrument, Sharpens Telescope's Focus' (Oct 14, 2026) NASA Roman blog, launch and commissioning posts (Aug 30 - Sep 30, 2026) NASA, Roman mission pages: core community surveys, ground systems, coronagraph fact sheet Nobel Prize in Physics 2011 summary (accelerating expansion of the universe) Scientific American and Space.com on the FY2026 budget proposal for Roman NASA/JPL, 'Roman and Euclid will team up to investigate dark energy' (2023) Nancy Grace Roman biography (NASA history; Wikipedia citations) Related on Brink: Perseverance breaks the off-world driving record (Brink) While checking this one, the "30 percent better" headline turned out to be about optical error (63 nm measured against a 90 nm requirement), not about bigger or sharper pictures in a simple sense. NASA's own post went up on October 14; most re-reports came days later. Images: NASA, ESA and others via Wikimedia Commons (licenses listed below) ESO - Milky Way / ESO/S. Brunier / CC BY 4.0 Euclid galactic bulge – molecular cloud ESA522822 / ESA/Euclid/Euclid Consortium/NASA, CFHT, / CC BY-SA 3.0 igo Webb Takes Its First Exoplanet Image (HIP-65426b) / NASA/ESA/CSA, A Carter (UCSC), the ERS 1 / CC BY 4.0 Euclid spacecraft ESA24912474 / European Space Agency / CC BY-SA 3.0 igo L2 rendering / ESA / CC BY 4.0 13 public-domain / CC0 works Video: short muted excerpts of NASA videos (public domain), 11 clips. Sound effects: Mixkit (free license) and generated. Subscribe for the next story, explained properly. #RomanSpaceTelescope #NASA #DarkEnergy