Mom Secretly Sends Newborn Away for Adoption — Dad Says “That’s My Child” as Judge Orders DNA Test
Custody Court Live
0:00 / 0:00
Mom Secretly Sends Newborn Away for Adoption — Dad Says “That’s My Child” as Judge Orders DNA Test
1 729 просмотров · 2 недели назад
Custody Court Live
1,04 тыс. подписчиков
1 729 просмотров · 2 недели назад
A tense family-court hearing takes an unexpected turn when the father learns that a newborn he believes is his child has been placed with a prospective adoptive family in Colorado.
The father’s attorney asks the court for emergency relief, DNA testing, and the return of the children. The mother’s attorney presents a very jurisdiction question: can a child involved in an ongoing Tennessee divorce mother, and both children, while also directing the father to participate in the Colorado adoption proceedings. proceedings and commentary intended for informational and entertainment purposes, and informational purposes. It is not legal advice and does not establish the facts or legal conclusions of the underlying case. Statements made in court are attributed to the speakers and may represent allegations or disputed claims rather than established facts. Viewers should consult—the attorney raises the jurisdiction issue, the judge directly responds, then explains why moving the child to another state does not, in his view, eliminate the Tennessee different account, citing an existing order of protection and allegations of domestic violence.
The judge then addresses a critical jurisdiction question: can a child involved in an ongoing Tennessee divorce and custody dispute be moved to another state and placed for adoption?
The court ultimately orders DNA testing involving the father, mother, and both children, while also directing the father to participate in the Colorado adoption proceedings. A further hearing is scheduled to address the larger dispute.
This video contains courtroom proceedings and commentary intended for informational and entertainment purposes.
Disclaimer: This video is presented for commentary, educational, and informational purposes. It is not legal advice and does not establish the facts or legal conclusions of the underlying case. Statements made in court are attributed to the speakers and may represent allegations or disputed claims rather than established facts. Viewers should consult qualified legal professionals for advice regarding their own circumstances.