Cop LOSES Qualified Immunity After Insane Arrest!

One scam can cost you everything — protect yourself now. First 100 users get 20% off with code "auditthecourt" at https://coveron.com/auditthecourt A Tucson police officer accused of shoving a woman into a palm tree tries to avoid trial by claiming qualified immunity. But when his attorney takes the case to a federal appeals court, the judges begin questioning whether the appeal should have been filed at all, and the person arguing against him turns out to be a law student who makes a compelling case for letting a jury decide. Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0342Stf... Patreon:   / auditthecourt   Sponsorship inquiries: audit@fixated.com Get The Civilian Rights Handguide here: https://a.co/d/aDvE0xL Submit your video here: auditthecourtroom@gmail.com Second Channel:    / @audittheaudit   Sponsorship inquiries: audit@fixated.com Welcome to Audit the Court, where we explore the legal nuance underpinning the American justice system. Join us as we examine the laws, rulings, and controversies behind real trials, hearings, and legal proceedings. 00:00 - Case Background 01:39 - Qualified Immunity Defense 05:10 - Excessive Force Evidence 10:50 - Clearly Established Law 14:30 - Plaintiff Oral Argument 19:35 - Graham Factors Analysis 23:14 - Defense Rebuttal 25:14 - Final Ninth Circuit Ruling DISCLAIMER The content presented on Audit the Court is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, legal opinion, or a substitute for professional legal counsel. All legal analysis reflects our interpretation of publicly available records, statutes, and case law at the time of production, and may not reflect the most current legal developments. Laws, regulations, and court procedures vary by jurisdiction, and the applicability of the legal concepts discussed herein will depend on the specific facts and governing law of each case. Nothing in this program creates an attorney-client relationship, and viewers should consult a qualified attorney licensed in their jurisdiction for legal advice pertaining to their specific situation. While every effort is made to ensure the accuracy of the information provided, Audit the Court makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of any information contained herein. FAIR USE This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video. Original video:    • 19-15214 Basilea Mena v. Robert Massie   United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit's channel:    / @9thcircuit   Ninth Circuit decision: https://bit.ly/4hsxbu6 Supreme Court docket: https://bit.ly/3W5SAAS Sources: Tolan v. Cotton- https://bit.ly/4i1wXdw Saucier v. Katz- https://bit.ly/3Vw8Ef5 Ashcroft v. al-Kidd- https://bit.ly/4i2jBxF Kisela v. Hughes- https://bit.ly/4ATV71k Graham v. Connor- https://bit.ly/4e8ngaP Gravelet-Blondin v. Shelton- https://bit.ly/4rNmBS1 Meredith v. Erath- https://bit.ly/46VBd8l