Flock Safety: ‘Opt Out of Society’ or Get the Police Called on You? Worker Calls 911 on Reporter.

A Flock Safety worker putting up a license plate camera on a public road outside Atlanta called 911 because a reporter was filming him from 40 yards away. Three Milton, Georgia police cars stopped investigative reporter Brendan Keefe for 17 minutes. No ticket. No charge. And no video of the install. Months earlier, Flock's own spokesman told the same reporter you can opt out of Flock cameras only "if you want to opt out of society." I break down the law in five questions: Did he have the right to film? What does Flock say about privacy in public? Was the stop legal? Can he sue the Flock worker? And is Flock itself legal? Plus the second Flock 911 call ("we need a favor"), real Supreme Court audio, and a blooper starring my dog, Goose. CHAPTERS 0:00 News: Flock worker calls 911 on a reporter 0:22 A reporter, a camera, three police cars 2:38 Who I am 3:17 What the 911 call and body cam show 6:24 Question 1: Did he have the right to film? 9:53 Blooper: Goose takes out the microphone 11:26 Question 2: What Flock says about privacy 12:55 "Opt out of society" 13:52 Question 3: Was the stop legal? 17:44 17 minutes on the side of the road 18:37 Question 4: Can he sue the Flock worker? 21:38 The second 911 call: "We need a favor" 23:14 Question 5: Is Flock itself legal? 24:48 Real court audio: Justice Kagan 26:22 The Norfolk Flock lawsuit: "Not today" 27:43 Real court audio: Justice Gorsuch 28:50 One rule for everyone 29:45 If you film a Flock install NEED A LAWYER IN YOUR STATE? I only practice in Tennessee, Arkansas and Georgia, and I cannot take cases or give referrals in other states. To find a civil rights (Section 1983) lawyer where you live, use the National Police Accountability Project's directory: https://nationalpoliceaccountability.... You can also search "Section 1983 lawyer" plus your state. WATCH NEXT SHERIFF PRESS CONFERENCE Was a 17-Year-Old "Flocked" by a Deputy? What the Sheriff Actually Said:    • SHERIFF PRESS CONFERENCE  Was a 17-Year-Ol...   Flock Surveillance System Hacked By a Youtuber: What You Need to Know:    • Flock Surveillance System Hacked By a Yout...   The Supreme Court Just Put a Leash on Police Geofence Warrants:    • The Supreme Court Just Put a Leash on Poli...   SOURCES InvestigateTV / Atlanta News First, Sept. 8, 2026 (911 audio, dash cam, Milton PD body cam, Flock statement); ANF "Behind the Investigation," Sept. 30, 2026 Flock Safety white paper on ALPRs and the Fourth Amendment Smith v. City of Cumming (11th Cir. 2000); Glik v. Cunniffe (1st Cir. 2011); Irizarry v. Yehia (10th Cir. 2022) Katz v. United States (1967); United States v. Knotts (1983); United States v. Jones (2012) Terry v. Ohio (1968); Florida v. J.L. (2000); Navarette v. California (2014); Rodriguez v. United States (2015) Chan v. Ellis (Ga. 2015); O.C.G.A. 16-5-90, 16-5-92, 16-10-26, 16-11-39.2 Dennis v. Sparks (1980); Moldowan v. City of Warren (6th Cir. 2009) Carpenter v. United States (2018), argument audio Nov. 29, 2017 Schmidt v. City of Norfolk (E.D. Va. Jan. 27, 2026); Commonwealth v. McCarthy (Mass. 2020) Chatrie v. United States (June 29, 2026), argument audio April 27, 2026 Justice portraits: Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States MUMFORD LAW: OFF THE RECORD (second channel):    / @mumfordlawofftherecord   Facebook: Law Office of Roland Mumford MUMFORD LAW Roland Mumford, civil rights lawyer Law Office of Roland Mumford 242 West Main Street, No. 223, Hendersonville, TN 37075 https://mumford.law #FlockCameras #FlockSafety #RightToRecord #FirstAmendment #FourthAmendment FAIR USE NOTICE This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright. NOTE: We don't condone threats or violence of any kind. If you are upset or outraged by acts of government misconduct featured in this video, we encourage you to utilize lawful means of expression, including becoming involved in the political process, as well as seeking accountability through the judicial system. NOTE ALSO: The information you obtain here is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your letters and electronic mail, or other submissions or messages. However, contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship is established and documented in a written agreement.